Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdsteel
I’ve heard so many contradictory things on this. If I remember correctly the age limit does not apply to women born American, only naturalized ones.

When this first came up two years ago, the text and the link to the actual immigration and naturalization law (which was in effect at the time of Zero's birth) was posted here.

I wish I had it now, but what it said, is that, if a mother is an American citizen, and gives birth to a baby whose father is a foreign citizen, while outside the boundaries of the territorial US, then the mother must be past the age of 14, plus 5 years for her to be able to confer US citizenship on that child.

This is one HUGE reason that it's vital for Obama's LFBC to be released. Stanley Ann Dunham was just short of her 19th birthday when Zero was born. If she gave birth to him outside the territorial US, then he's not even a US citizen, much less, a Natural Born Citizen.

100 posted on 04/25/2011 2:40:02 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier; jdsteel
"I’ve heard so many contradictory things on this. If I remember correctly the age limit does not apply to women born American, only naturalized ones.

When this first came up two years ago, the text and the link to the actual immigration and naturalization law (which was in effect at the time of Zero's birth) was posted here.

I wish I had it now, but what it said, is that, if a mother is an American citizen, and gives birth to a baby whose father is a foreign citizen, while outside the boundaries of the territorial US, then the mother must be past the age of 14, plus 5 years for her to be able to confer US citizenship on that child.

This is one HUGE reason that it's vital for Obama's LFBC to be released. Stanley Ann Dunham was just short of her 19th birthday when Zero was born. If she gave birth to him outside the territorial US, then he's not even a US citizen, much less, a Natural Born Citizen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assuming overseas birth, AND assuming Sr. and SADO were legally married, he would not have received U.S. citizenship based, only, on his mother's citizenship status.

Per U.S. law at the time of his birth (December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986). Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock: "For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child." http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html

**************PAGE AT LINK ABOVE NOW REMOVED sometime around August 2010 (http://replay.web.archive.org/20100820225004/http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html - USE BELOW LINK***********************

http://germany.usembassy.gov/acs/claimtocitizenship/

Also found here:
"1952 Immigration and Nationality Act Title3 Chapter1" http://www.scribd.com/doc/8693236/1952-Immigration-and-Nationality-Act-Title3-Chapter1

102 posted on 04/25/2011 3:18:49 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson