5-4 to evil eh?
Is this just the expedite ruling, to make it go faster?
Probably just saying they will not hears it until fall,
What is the number of justices that need to agree to hear the case? Did we just witness a cloaked 5-4 ruling? Or did just one justice say no and who was it? My money is on Butch.
Choosing, for now, to remain on the sidelines of the national constitutional debate over the new health care law, the Supreme Court refused on Monday to put Virginia’s challenge to the law on a fast track with review by the Justices ahead of any appeals court decisions. There were no dissents noted, and there was no comment. The Court granted no new cases.
The legal side of the health care controversy will now revert to six federal courts of appeals where challenges are unfolding; the first hearing in one of those cases will be May 10 at the Fourth Circuit Court in Richmond, Va.
Dereliction of duty.
Clowns wearing black robes.
The Constitution means nothing to them anymore.
These conservative Justices are not stupid, especially when they all know that the Obamanites, i.e. old news media, blogs etc., will disseminate them if they jump the gun on this issue and rule against Obama.
They are simply going to overturn Obama by the book, by the letter of the law, and strictly by the limitations found in our Constitution.
The article is up now
The SCOTUS is totally corrupt, the very fact taht they refuse to hear any Birth cert case speaks volumes o the state of our country.
Bad news.
Here is a little bit that is in the Death care bill..You can’t tell me this freak isn’t a Muslim..
> Dhimmitude — What does it mean?
>
>
>
> Obama used it in the health care bill.
>
> Now isn’t this interesting? It was used in the health care law.
>
> Every day there’s another revelation of what Obama and his fellow Democrats
> are doing to our country.
>
> Dhimmitude — I had never heard the word until now. Type it into Google and
> start reading. Pretty interesting. It’s on page 107 of the healthcare bill.
> I looked this up on Google and yep, it exists. It is a REAL word.
>
> Word of the Day: Dhimmitude
>
> Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations
> conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in
> exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting
> conquered remnants to Islam.
>
> ObamaCare allows the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in
> the United States. Muslims are specifically exempted from the government
> mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being
> uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be “gambling”, “risk-taking”, and
> “usury” and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based
> on this.
>
> How convenient. So I, as a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed
> against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts
> receivables, and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance
> or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty
> and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by the de facto government
> insurance. Non-Muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. Period.
> This is Dhimmitude.
>
> Dhimmitude serves two purposes: It enriches the Muslim masters AND serves to
> drive conversions to Islam. In this case, the incentive to convert to Islam
> will be taken up by those in the inner-cities as well as the godless
> Generation X, Y, and Z types who have no moral anchor. If you don’t believe
> in Christ to begin with, it is no problem whatsoever to sell Him for 30 pieces
> of silver. “Sure, I’ll be a Muslim if it means free health insurance and no
> taxes. Where do I sign, bro?”
>
> I recommend sending this post to your contacts. This is desperately important
> and people need to know about it —
The replies to the post are predictable. Jim should rename this forum “Knee-jerk Republic.”
I don’t have a problem with this. Let the Fourth Circuit knock it down first. In the mean time, it will force the GOP House to act. There is no need to let them off the hook by having the court do their work for them. There is a debt ceiling bill coming up shortly. All they need to do is to defund Obamacare with that bill and remove all restrictions placed upon States and the People. It’s really that simple. And if Obama vetoes it, then he won’t have the money to implement it anyway. It’s a win-win situation. But then these are Republicans we’re talking about. Only a Republican can take a win-win situation and turn it into a lose-lose.
The states themselves need to decide what they're going to do regardless of the federal government. Each state will have to say, "We don't want your money, we don't want your taxes, and we don't want your Marxism. Each state will have to say, "We'll stay a Constitutional Republic."
Republic of Idaho? Republic of Texas?
Starting to sound better all the time.