Posted on 04/26/2011 7:19:39 AM PDT by Bed_Zeppelin
Where's Sharpton, where's Jackson, and for that matter, where's Obama and Holder? What am I talking about? I'm talking about the vicious beating a young white transgendered "woman" suffered at the hands of two black girls, one of whom was only 14 years old. Pursuant to Obama-Holder, will they treat this as they have the case involving the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case, i.e., if you ain't black it don't matter?
I should here state in the strongest possible terms my condemnation of homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. But just as my objection to sexual perversion is based upon biblical precedent, so too is my condemnation of this hateful act.
Obama was quick to inject himself into the Cambridge, Mass., Police Department doing its job when they properly questioned professor Henry Louis Gates to make sure he was alone and not being forced to say so by an unseen villain hiding inside his house. Why hasn't he been as quick to condemn this act? I'm not surprised by Holder's silence, considering his staunch refusal to seat a panel to investigate the NBPP case in Philadelphia.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
"How quickly would it have been reported had the beaters been white and the victim black? The simple reason is: because there is profit to be made by keeping blacks angry and whites guilty."
McDonald’s has been going after the inner city customer for a while now.....well, you got what ya wanted, Ronald.
A chicken mcnuggets summit?
Even more conspicuous by their absence, where is GLAAD, ACTUP and all the other usual suspects? But then again if they can turn a blind eye to public executions of suspected homosexuals in Tehran, then a he/she getting a beat-down by a couple of home girls is no big “thang”.
So the beat goes on. But like a faucet that just keeps dripping this $hit is getting old.
“McDonald’s has been going after the inner city customer for a while now.....well, you got what ya wanted, Ronald.”
While McDonalds like many other corporations have stupid policies directing their staff to stay out of these confrontations I seriously doubt McDonalds or Ronald “WANTED” this.
All corporations need to review their policies on staff when it comes to someone getting the cr@p beat out of them. Certainly McDonalds does not have a policy of telling certain savages, who slipped through the interview process, to tell the perps to scatter because the cops are coming.
Since when on the FR are corporations viewed as evil just like on the DU board? How many people have you hired? How many people have you fed? How much have you given to charity.
I have been to many countries where a McDonalds or Burger King sign would have been a blessing.
I don’t agree with everything McDonalds does for sure and their policy, again like so many other corporations on violence needs some serious review.
THIS, as in the clientele. Did I really have to point that out?
Since when on the FR are corporations viewed as evil just like on the DU board?
Where did I call them evil?
That's quite the broad brush you like to use. Try to stay on message, ok?
You painted yourself with the broad brush and don’t try to dodge your own words.
You claimed McDonalds wanted this.
“McDonald’s has been going after the inner city customer for a while now.....well, you got what ya wanted, Ronald.”
Again, they wanted THE CLIENTELE
Sheesh, you don't need a degree to understand...or maybe you do.
and don’t try to dodge your own words.
I have explained my words.....twice, If you're unable to understand them, well I can't help that.
See? C-U-S-T-O-M-E-R.
Sheeeees!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.