Posted on 04/27/2011 6:09:26 AM PDT by DCBryan1
Edited on 04/27/2011 6:22:09 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
What do you make of the “Dunham” signature?
The “D” in Dunham looks like an image right on the paper itself, while the “unham” looks as though someone went into to photoshop and darkened each letter on a pixel basis. I mean you get the real crisp edges in the “unham”, but the “D” has the grayish squares that you normally see in a pixellated image.
Hey there girl!! Good to see ya.
It’s almost too good to be true. If Obama thought this was going to help him, he would have waited until closer to the election. Me thinks he is trying to preempt something big coming down the track. This is the beginning of the end of the REAL carnival barkers....the Obama Presidency. He is the biggest clown in the circus...LOL!
COLB not = BC. We are still waiting. But thanks Bamster for throwing gasoline on the fire today.
One of the Nordykes’ is File No. 151, Dept of Health 61 10637. Date accepted august 11, 1961
Shouldn't the earlier date have a lower serial number? Note that is NOT the case.
None of them.
I think this bc stuff was a red herring. Now they can say it’s finally over. I think the real issue is zero’s Indonesian citizenship. Did he ever relinquish it? We know he was a Muslim from his early school records.
It's all we have been asking for, the "proof" of who the father is. There's a little check mark in Box 11, hmmm!!
This document makes the Constitutional crisis even a more openly grave situation, especially with the way, the real Patriot, LTC. Lakin was unfairly treated!!!
This document is stamped April 25, 2011. White house just got this day before yesterday???
They’re trying to mesh all their previous lies into a cohesive document.
They’ve said that even the President can’t take a copy of his BC so they have to have it on security paper instead of photocopier paper, and it’s from the paper document rather than from microfilm. But they can’t have it certified because they said they can’t disclose a certified long-form. But they still want it to seem authentic so they have it half-certified (Onaka’s stamp but no seal and no border).
They didn’t manage to get it to be half-typed and half-written, as Fukino claimed it was.
And no matter how they slice it, that “date filed” that is 3 days before the Nordyke “date filed” still does not work with that BC# that is higher/later than the Nordyke BC#.
And there is no note of the 2006 amendment.
This is a bad forgery that highlights the inconsistencies in what the Hawaii officials have said. All the more reason to require the embedded transaction logs to be disclosed, together with the complete vital records history.
There is no way to make all their stories add up, but this as lame-ended an attempt as anything else they’ve done thus far.
What did he force him to do? Release a birth certificate. What an accomplishment. Certainly it’s the most important thing any potential candidate has ever done. We ought to skip the election and just inaugurate the Donald.
“Birtherism has been exposed and we no longer have to hear of it.”
_________________________________________________
You are delusional. If you think this solves anything, then you need to lay off the crack.
If you think we “no longer have to hear of it”, then I suggest you log off Free Republic (never to return), because for the next several years you will see EVEN MORE birther threads outlining the lies and deceptions Obama has dumped on Americans.
And EVEN MORE birther threads about the ongoing NBC issues.
But hey - if you don’t want to be annoyed by all this - then do as I say and log off. Go watch Oprah or the View or something.
Again?!
I agree, but I can see this is going no where, let’s pound him on other things
Regardless of which side of the issue one stands on Trumps out to attack Obamas credibility...even if it means he’s perceived by some as taking a hit himself.
What in the hell?
Different local registrar too.
Yes, yes, sure that might be something. But lets talk about kerning.
Abstract in Merriam/Webster dictionary says:
1c - insufficiently factual
2 - expressing a quality apart from the original
4 - having only intrinsic form with little or no attempt at pictorial representation or narrative content.
What time is the FED press conference?
“The left side is a curved page....and why the out of context border? The border has been added on purpose for some reason...”
Not just the border, but the green “security paper” background has been added below the “scanned original” section as well. Firstly, I’m sure they did not use security paper for birth certificates in 1961 (was it even invented yet?), much less the same pattern that Hawaii uses today. Secondly, the pattern of the security background aligns perfectly between the scanned section and the border. It appears, wherever the “scanned” section came from, the green security background text has been digitally placed behind it. This is not something that could ever qualify as an original document if it needed to be forensically examined, based on that fact alone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.