Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’ve never thought the birth cert was anything but a red herring. The question remains: what was the Framers intent in inserting ‘natural born citizen’ into the Constitution for the Office of POTUS, and POTUS only.

The long form being released shows father’s place of birth as “Kenya, East Africa.” Without documentation that BHO-I was naturalized pre-8/4/61, that would mean BHO was born with dual allegiance. There’s ample contemporaneous documentation that dual allegiance is precisely what the Framers wanted to avoid for POTUS.

If I were Trump I’d be pretty proud and honored, too. But this either resolves for all time that dual allegiance means nothing and we can have anchor babies walk into the Oval Office, or at some point the question of the term’s meaning has to be resolved.


220 posted on 04/27/2011 6:57:48 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

” But this either resolves for all time that dual allegiance means nothing and we can have anchor babies walk into the Oval Office,...”

Bingo.


234 posted on 04/27/2011 6:59:30 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson