Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
Are there any FReepers working in law that would have insight as to why the NLRB chooses to only sue two states instead of the four at this time?

So that if they lose, they can figure out a way to improve their approach for the other two states?

5 posted on 04/28/2011 9:22:29 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Thanks. That does seem like a possibility. Maybe they figure if they lost to all four states it would slam the door on them for future suits.


8 posted on 04/28/2011 9:29:04 AM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

“Employees may vote in a secret-ballot election conducted by the NLRB, or they may persuade an employer to voluntarily recognize a union after showing majority support for one. The board contends the amendments violate the second provision.”

This sounds screwy to me. Hold the secret-ballot vote, and if the majority wants a union, so be it. Making people sign a card is pure union thuggery, and intimidation! And I’ve been the victim of union thuggery! I was too good a worker. producing too many parts per day.


11 posted on 04/28/2011 9:34:43 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson