Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exbrit
Brewer also says she has concerns about whether Arizonans would have adequate [recourse] if mistreated by out-of-state insurers.”

This is exactly right. There are reasons why states have insurance oversight bodies, and a big reason is that it helps ensure the financial stability of insurance companies and protects state residents from half-@ssed insurance companies that operate outside of any state oversight.

18 posted on 04/29/2011 12:00:45 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

“It provided grants and loans to provide, start, or expand a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO); removed certain state restrictions for federally qualified HMOs; and required employers with 25 or more employees to offer federally certified HMO options”

Why don’t people understand that part about removing certain state restrictions? (The HMO Act) This was the year and the first shot fired in the war of federal takeover of healthcare. The states have very limited oversight of HMO healthcare plans, if any at all.


20 posted on 04/29/2011 12:12:22 PM PDT by blackdog (The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson