This AP version you have clearly omits some information as you can see remnants of the safety paper pattern at the left margin, but no where else. Nope. The AP version is a high contrast scan that omits all color except for some remaining gray in the left margin. It is not a digital photo (which starts with lesser quality) imported into a package like photoshop that does various processing like the layer creation. In any case, you need to explain how to go from your version:
to mine:
whereas I can easily explain how the original paper artifact was turned into your picture (digital photo, subsequently processed) and my picture (high contrast scan, no subsequent processing). It's the paper artifact and its content that we care about not some scan or photo, but we can't ignore any scans or photos.
First I is not MY image. It is th image the White House released on it's own f*****g web site. Any image the AP has they got from the WH.
I'm not going to start playing with these two images in the post I am responding to here. But it seems that they both show approximately the same magnification. If you take a look at the riser on the h in Dunham's signature in the image I supplied you can hardly see the pixels. In your image they are easy to see. My picture has more information.
As for you and the others who say they can "easily explain how the original paper artifact was turned into your picture," this gets old for me. Either point to some other pdf posted on the internet before April of this year which purports to be from a single scan of a single document that exhibits similar pixellation to that which the WH pdf exhibts, or cut the BS.
ML/NJ