[skeeter]

Good thing they kept some DNA, since they already disposed of his body. Wierd.

[UniqueViews]

“they already disposed of his body. “

That bothers me as well — why wasn’t he put on dispaly like Saddam Hussein’s sons were?

Obama seemed too concerned to observe “Islamic tradition” to bury the body within 24 hrs, and it seems UBL was buried at sea within less than 12 hrs, more like within 6 hrs. If he was killed in the afternoon and by the time Obama made his speech he was buried...

[Sacajaweau]

Really think they dumped him at sea?? I don't. I'm sure some forensic nut wants to see how sick he really was..

I think burial at sea is a lie.

[devattel]

I have read many documents in my profession with regards to DNA evidence.

Here is what does not pass the smell test:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/05/02/national/main20058850.shtml?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CBSNewsGamecore+(GameCore%3A+CBSnews.com)

According to the authorities, the DNA test was validated with 99% confidence. This is a lie. DNA can never be validated to that level for identification purposes unless a blood workup is done within a specified time frame to the test. Second, one can not use a sibling's DNA sample to provide 99% identification of any other family member.

What sibling tests can do is verify whether a person is a half sibling or a full sibling. That is as far as the test goes. The media continues to lie about the death of Bin Laden. All intelligence from the Middle East has stated Bin Laden died years ago.

The outcome is the same: death of Bin Laden. The politics behind the death is different. Which is more beneficial to the war on terror? Death from natural causes, or death from the hand of the Allied Forces?