Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief
The headlines yesterday in the Houston Chronicle said he was unarmed. sob~

I could not bring myself to read the accompanying story.

13 posted on 05/05/2011 8:07:01 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ditter

And you know what,, he wasn’t unarmed. The slighest move on his part could VERY REASONABLY be expected to detonate a bomb.

It’s well known not to tell a suspected suicide bomber to raise his hands. That small act can be the trigger to set off the bomb.

Osama set out to be the most dangerous terrorist on earth. He built an empire on suicide belts. And he succeeded. And that put him in a position that he gets almost no leeway.
If he isnt naked in the shower,,, nothing short of a bullet to the head makes sense. He is an immense danger until he is turned off.
It’s silly for them to say he was “unarmed”. The risk to arrest his was extreme, and was not worth risking a single SEAL life.


86 posted on 05/05/2011 9:23:29 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson