Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
Yes indeed. The legislation need not at any point spell out “By the way, under the Constitution - this resolution is a de facto implied or implicit “declaration of war”.”

But it is a necessity, one tragically overlooked in the case of Libya - giving cover to cowardly Democrats who don't want to be on record voting for war - and to cowardly Republicans who don't want to be on record voting for 0bama’s war.

45 posted on 05/05/2011 4:14:01 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

Ah, but we have something even better to the democrats, we have a UN resolution.


51 posted on 05/06/2011 3:10:48 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson