Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killing Osama (Oliver North)
Creators Syndicate ^ | May 6, 2011 | Oliver North

Posted on 05/05/2011 6:54:28 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: jazusamo
Nobody knows whether the Seal Team killed Osama(or a look alike), and nobody will EVER KNOW!!!..

The cadaver was rushed to the Vincent and send on to be with 72 Sturgeons..

21 posted on 05/05/2011 7:43:32 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

BTTT !!


22 posted on 05/05/2011 7:52:21 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You are wise.

LLS


23 posted on 05/05/2011 8:07:26 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: musicman

When dealing with a secret operation one should answer, “ I can neither confirm or deny the action.” Keeping quiet lets one take action on what has been found without blabbing it to the world.


24 posted on 05/05/2011 8:08:34 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
What is protocol on head shots versus center mass on an operation like this?

Firstly, there is no body armor on the head (and if there is one, like a helmet, you can see it.) Secondly, center mass shots may be survivable; two shots to the head from anything at or above .223 are not.

25 posted on 05/05/2011 8:21:04 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Col North identifies the biggest blunder of Obama in the whole operation: immediately announcing it.

It was absolutely stupid. Didn’t it occur to Obama, Hillary or Panetta that the immediate announcement might compromise the usefulness of gathered intelligence from the site?

On its own, it would have taken at least 36-72 hours before the Pakistani authorities would have figured out exactly what happened and word leaked out to other members of the al Qaeda network that bin Laden had been killed and his computers, etc. taken. Maybe even longer, depending on bin Laden’s regular communication methods.

Waiting even just a week to announce it might have given our intelligence agencies a fighting chance to roll up other parts of the network who might not yet have gotten the word.

It is almost as if they wanted to quickly alert al Qaeda to what happened. Are they really that stupid? Or were they so eager to credit Obama (”I, me, I, I, me”) as the great Osama-killer that they just didn’t care that they were leaving things on the table?


26 posted on 05/05/2011 8:31:50 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I can confirm OBL has been killed. Beyond that, I have no comment would have been best.


27 posted on 05/05/2011 8:59:07 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
If he is a muslim, and if - as many suspect - he is a 'Manchurian candidate' with the intent to help islam dominate the world by diminishing 'the great satan' (America), then he and Obama are just two parts of the same team.

In which case, his immediate announcement serves well in, as you point out, alerting the rest of the team while making obsolete any intel gleaned from the mission.

This seems to fit in with many things he's done, such as tie our soldiers' hands with ROE that benefit the enemy and the like. imo

28 posted on 05/05/2011 9:12:41 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

My typo - what’s the difference between ‘Obama’ and ‘Osama’? Just a little bs.


29 posted on 05/05/2011 9:15:03 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

North makes a good point...as do other posters responding here.

Since Pakistan officials claim they didn’t know he was there, but for Obama’s eagerness to take credit, no one would know who we took out.

For all anyone would know, it could have been another #2 link in the terrorist chain. Pakistan surely couldn’t claim we got Osama. Since they claim they didn’t know he was there. Then, if they later claimed it was Osama, then they would be admitting they knew he was there.

Obviously, sooner or later, no matter what, the truth would be outed. Still, in the interim, much more intelligence could have been garnered. Beginning with-—what did the Pakistani’s know, and when did they know it?

Obama’s eagerness to take credit, created a narrative for the Pakistani officials, letting them off the hook. Doing so, at a time when they should be held accountable to the world, for harboring a fugitive.

Instead, now the narrative is to release the pics, or to not release the pics. When the narrative should be to charge Pakistan officials for harboring a fugitive.


30 posted on 05/05/2011 9:21:29 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (Repeal the 16th amendment . Send Islam packing to their homeland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

North makes the best case for not releasing the photos.


31 posted on 05/05/2011 9:38:53 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Turning this into a media circus may have been Obama’s intent. He's hoping to prevent the killing of more of his Muslim terrorist buddies in the future, so there's method to the madness.
32 posted on 05/05/2011 9:58:04 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

ping to an excellent article. Ollie North cuts to the bottom line on many aspects of the mission that took out bin Laden.


33 posted on 05/05/2011 10:19:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Thanks! Reading this made me feel better. I recall my dad saying loose lips sink ships, 0 needs to learn that. The no comment was the perfect answer. However 0’s personality will never allow him not to crow like a rooster even if it put us in danger IMHO.
34 posted on 05/05/2011 10:33:36 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812
However 0’s personality will never allow him not to crow like a rooster even if it put us in danger IMHO.

You're right and he has. As others have said; only 0bummer could screw up the successful mission of taking out the most notorious terrorist of our time. I bet he drinks straight out of the milk carton and backwashes too. lol

35 posted on 05/05/2011 10:57:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Next rooster I get I am going to have to name it Obama. Maybe a goat can be Biden.


36 posted on 05/05/2011 11:10:17 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Greysard
Firstly, there is no body armor on the head (and if there is one, like a helmet, you can see it.) Secondly, center mass shots may be survivable; two shots to the head from anything at or above .223 are not.

What do you call two shots and a splash of salt water?

A bin Laden cocktail!

37 posted on 05/05/2011 11:16:52 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
It is almost as if they wanted to quickly alert al Qaeda to what happened. Are they really that stupid?

Maybe Obama really did want to alert them.

Remember his face in that situation-room photo? Absolutely grim-faced, and it looked to me like he did NOT want this to be happening, as if he were more concerned about his brother-in-faith Osama Bin Laden and the welfare of the Umma.

Look at it again. Does his face look like he's the concerned captain-in-chief of our military? Or an ideologue getting bad news about a brother-in-arms? He looks like he's watching Rodney King reruns, actually.

38 posted on 05/05/2011 11:38:23 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Fourth, the decision not to release "death photos" of bin Laden was right. Bowe Bergdahl, a U.S. Army soldier, is still being held by the Taliban. Enough said. "

Based on this, they should have kept quiet about killing OBL till the soldier was released. Now, who knows what will happen to him. Meanwhile they insult us that the photo is too gory.

39 posted on 05/06/2011 1:20:44 AM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

SEALs practice mainly headshots in CQB. They assume their targets are wearing body armor. No 2+1. Just two to the head.


40 posted on 05/06/2011 4:35:57 AM PDT by Travis McGee (Navy SEALs: They'll shoot your eyes out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson