Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women Can Sniff Out Men Without Knowing—And Vice Versa
National Geographic ^ | Published May 5, 2011 | Rachel Kaufman

Posted on 05/06/2011 1:08:34 PM PDT by Red Badger

Sexual chemicals affect how we identify an androgynous figure.

Women and men can sniff out the opposite sex via odorless pheromones, a new study suggests.

The discovery adds another piece to the growing body of evidence that humans, much like the rest of the animal kingdom, know more from their noses than previously thought.

"We know that for animals, chemosignals are actually the most used signals to communicate, whereas with humans, we think chemosensation is not really used," said study leader Wen Zhou, a psychologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing.

"But based on our experiences, they are still influenced by these cues, even if they don't explicitly know it."

In a recent experiment, subjects who smelled possible pheromones from the opposite sex were more likely to interpret ambiguous human figures as that sex—even when the participants didn't know they were smelling anything.

Pheromones—chemicals that can communicate sexual information—are widespread in the animal world, and some research suggests humans use them unconsciously as well.

(See "Lesbians Respond Differently to 'Human Pheromones,' Study Says.")

Zhou and colleagues used videos of points of light moving in a way that fools the eye into seeing human motion.

The videos were made by filming real people in motion-capture suits with LEDs at each joint—similar to the suits used to create Hollywood special effects.

Then the scientists mathematically manipulated the dots until the "figures" had neither a typically male nor typically female gait.

Sex Pheromones Influence Gender Choice

Twenty men and 20 women watched the video animations of these ambiguous figures, as well as ones that were more obviously male or female. While watching the videos, the subjects sniffed clove oil infused with the male steroid androstadienone, the female steroid estratetraenol, or a plain oil used as a base for many cosmetics.

Men who smelled the female pheromone were more likely to identify the androgynous walker as a woman, and even were more likely to identify more clearly male figures as female than those who just smelled clove oil.

(Also read "Women's Tears Reduce Sex Drive in Men, Study Hints.")

The same results applied when women sniffed the male compound: They more frequently saw the ambiguous figures as male than the women who smelled the plain oil.

Estratetraenol had no effect on women, and androstadienone didn't affect men.

This perception difference seems to be completely unrelated to what their noses told them: A blindfolded test subject couldn't tell the difference between steroid-infused clove oil and plain oil.

"It's completely below their awareness," Zhou said. "They didn't know what they were smelling, but their behavior showed these different patterns."

Zhou presented the research in April at the annual meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: nose; odors; olfactory; pheremones; scents; smell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
The nose knows.............
1 posted on 05/06/2011 1:08:42 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Scent of a Wench..or something like that


2 posted on 05/06/2011 1:10:16 PM PDT by evad (Obama needs to show us his green card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Women Can Sniff Out Men Without Knowing—And Vice Versa

Frankly, it sounds like something Miggs would say.

Not anymore....

3 posted on 05/06/2011 1:12:33 PM PDT by edpc (Tagline under construction: Your American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars at work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Way to tell us something we already know, again, science! Keep on gobbling up our money.


4 posted on 05/06/2011 1:13:55 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad; Red Badger
Scent of a Wench..or something like that

Scent of a Skank...or something like that

5 posted on 05/06/2011 1:16:49 PM PDT by bigheadfred (Beat me, Bite me...Make Me Write Bad Checks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

So true, we’d be happier back in our caves covered in lice. Durn Science!


6 posted on 05/06/2011 1:18:20 PM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

7 posted on 05/06/2011 1:18:44 PM PDT by central_va
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
In a recent experiment, subjects who smelled possible pheromones from the opposite sex were more likely to interpret ambiguous human figures as that sex—even when the participants didn't know they were smelling anything.

ChiComs leadership: How can we weaponize it?

8 posted on 05/06/2011 1:20:25 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse ((unite))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred; evad; central_va

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42927752/ns/us_news-life/t/cops-rape-comment-sparks-wave-slutwalks/


9 posted on 05/06/2011 1:21:13 PM PDT by Red Badger (Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Men who smelled the female pheromone were more likely to identify the androgynous walker as a woman

The perception was done automatically subconsciously, but the interpretation was done by the faculty of reason consciously based on its analysis of the perception.

10 posted on 05/06/2011 1:21:34 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

“So true, we’d be happier back in our caves covered in lice. Durn Science!”

Yes, that’s exactly what I was saying. Go ahead and throw out Einstein and Newton along with “Eating Twinkies Linked to Increased Erection Frequency (IEF) in Males”; they’re pretty much the same thing.


11 posted on 05/06/2011 1:23:19 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That many sluts all grouped up...and I missed it.


12 posted on 05/06/2011 1:24:17 PM PDT by bigheadfred (Beat me, Bite me...Make Me Write Bad Checks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Women Can Sniff Out Men Without Knowing

After a hard day of working in the yard, Mrs. Cajun has stated, in no uncertain terms, that she can definitely sniff out the old Cajun.
Can she apply for some government grant on her study?

13 posted on 05/06/2011 1:24:24 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Bachmann, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sent can trigger a strong and instant response even after many years too. I was shopping at a Kroger’s last year and when this woman walked by I caught a good whiff of her perfume. I still remember how I instantaneously recognized it and my head whipped around even though I hadn’t smelled it for almost 25 years.

It was called Jauntu or spelled something like that, and my first love back in HS wore it always. I looked at her and said “Jauntu” with a smile, she seemed pretty impressed by the look on her face I could name an obscure brand like that.

I spent the rest of the trip floating down memory lane, amazed at the strong response I had to one little smell.


14 posted on 05/06/2011 1:24:38 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m going to do a study that proves that 99% of all studies have the results determined before the study is performed.


15 posted on 05/06/2011 1:27:47 PM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

That smell is not pheromones. It is just stink. LOL


16 posted on 05/06/2011 1:29:20 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I know that the smell of my wife keeps me interested.


17 posted on 05/06/2011 1:32:07 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp

“Lesbians Respond Differently to ‘Human Pheromones,’ Study Says.” is probably the purpose of this study—to show that lesbians are genetically different from other women.

Of the lesbians I have seen, many tend to be unattractive man haters.


18 posted on 05/06/2011 1:33:21 PM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I seem to remember the word *stink* in her comments preceded by the word *you* :^)


19 posted on 05/06/2011 1:33:32 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Bachmann, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

“It was called Jauntu or spelled something like that...”

Jontue? It was big in the late 70’s - all the disco ladies’ rooms reeked of it!

My boyfriend of the time liked it, too.


20 posted on 05/06/2011 1:35:18 PM PDT by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson