Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Fat, (token?) black, lesbian, out-of-touch, liberal elitist?

CIP: As Gore's for-a-while campaign manager in 2000, Brazile clumsily started a furor within her own party -- which was trying to appeal to the middle class, political independents and suburban voters -- when she said the pillars of the Democratic Party were African Americans, organized labor, women and homosexuals.

1 posted on 05/08/2011 11:29:44 AM PDT by flowerplough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: flowerplough

What an idiot


2 posted on 05/08/2011 11:32:53 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

Corruption at higher levels Proof positive these tyrants are not interested in fairness, integrity. It’s all about them and their selfish interests


3 posted on 05/08/2011 11:34:22 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Celebrate 'Civility'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
The face of sheer racist stupidity.......


4 posted on 05/08/2011 11:34:41 AM PDT by NWFLConservative (Game On.......Fight Like a Girl!!...............Saracuda in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

“...a partisan tactic designed to weed out voters who are more likely to be Democrats and help the GOP on Election Day.”

Likely to be illegals, non-registered and/or dead!


5 posted on 05/08/2011 11:35:41 AM PDT by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
she said the pillars of the Democratic Party were African Americans, organized labor, women and homosexuals.

Score one for her! - Absolutely CORRECT !

6 posted on 05/08/2011 11:36:15 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

In the game of voter fraud, Democrats’ opposition to the voter photo id requirement is what’s known as a poker tell.


7 posted on 05/08/2011 11:36:57 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

>but Brazile claims that they’re a partisan tactic designed to weed out voters who are more likely to be Democrats and help the GOP on Election Day. <

Why thank you for pointing that out, Dummycrat. These “voters” are NOT residents nor citizens, ergo, they should NOT vote. See Donna, you dont have to stay at the Holiday Inn to figure that out.


8 posted on 05/08/2011 11:37:11 AM PDT by max americana (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
Under a Kansas bill, not only must voters show a photo ID at the polls; in order to register to vote, they will also have to produce their birth certificate or other proof of citizenship.

Oh! The humanity! Why, you mean that people will actually have to demonstrate that they are eligible to vote? They will actually have to demonstrate that they are whom they say they are when appearing at the polls? What's a Democrat to do? How can they be expected to win an election if only eligible, registered voters are allowed to cast a ballot? This will be the end of the world as they know it.

This measure is no longer a bill, its now the law and I will proudly show my identification at the next election.

9 posted on 05/08/2011 11:37:46 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
Give voter fraud the finger!


10 posted on 05/08/2011 11:39:05 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 837 of our national holiday from reality. - It's 3 AM, time to arrest Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

Donna doesn’t approve of corruption being exposed.


11 posted on 05/08/2011 11:42:29 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

I guess if the question is “what is the capital of Mongolia?”, she is right. If the question is “how do we improve the integrity of the ballot box?” she is completely wrong.


12 posted on 05/08/2011 11:42:54 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

Hey Donna, you know that photo ID to vote and proof of citizenship to register will put a big dent in that Dem voter base.


14 posted on 05/08/2011 11:47:48 AM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
"The photo-identification laws that Republicans are pushing across the country are most likely to disenfranchise young Americans, poor Americans and minorities -- "

...all those who aren't eligible to vote as well as the people we pay to vote multiple times in different precincts. (sarcasm)

15 posted on 05/08/2011 11:48:17 AM PDT by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

Seriously, how many citizens cannot produce any proof of it? If this is really a problem, we need to be looking at THAT. I think virtually everyone has a photo ID and it’s really seriously time people like this woman are called on the lie that they don’t. I’m so sick of duplicity in public officials.


16 posted on 05/08/2011 11:49:02 AM PDT by brytlea (Trying to think of something worth the waste of a keystroke...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
Donna Brazile and her companions are ultimately opposed to the idea of elections period. By eliminating any requirements for voting eligibility they simply bring on chaos that will only be restored by a totalitarian state. In that case, elections are held only as window dressing, but they are meaningless.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

17 posted on 05/08/2011 11:50:58 AM PDT by newheart (The trouble ain't too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right. -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

OK Donna Brazilla-——when we don’t need to show our photo ID at airports, banks and retailers then its a go. Until then No ID should equal No voting. PERIOD!


18 posted on 05/08/2011 11:53:01 AM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

And where, may I ask, are the Republicans lined up to say “This is designed to prevent illegal voting which is the mainstay of the Democrat Party. Tough sh*t.”


19 posted on 05/08/2011 11:53:12 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

Nope.

All the people she decribes have to have photo id of some kind already.

You can’t get utilities set up without photo id. You can’t buy cars without it. You can’t open any bank accounts without it. You have to show police officers id under certain circumstances. You cannot buy alcohol at a grocery store without it.

This is such a sham argument. All the bills always hav a provision if the people are too poor the state can provide them one. And illegals are not supposed to be able to vote so there’s no issue here, unless the dems (we know) want them to be able to vote illegally.


21 posted on 05/08/2011 11:57:28 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough

Vote fraud isn’t the answer, either. Can we please have uncorrupted elections? The public has so little input into its government as it is.


22 posted on 05/08/2011 11:58:19 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: flowerplough
"The photo-identification laws that Republicans are pushing across the country are most likely to disenfranchise young Americans, poor Americans and minorities -- individuals who are least likely to have government identification or to be able to afford to get it," said Brazile in a recent DNC statement.

Brazile is uttering nonsense by claiming that individuals who are least likely to have government identification or to be able to afford to get it, will be disenfranchised. Even if this government spends not a penny of our tax dollars to ensure that all have access to government identification, other charitable organizations would step up to the plate to provide id. They already do.

A small fraction of the waste and corruption in government spending would easily pay for id for all.

The Democrats are deathly afraid of losing the edge they probably have with undocumented voters.

23 posted on 05/08/2011 11:58:29 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson