Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official: Obama OK'd raid based on '50-50'chance bin Laden was there
CNN ^ | May 8, 2011 | CNN Wire Staff

Posted on 05/08/2011 2:14:52 PM PDT by UniqueViews

President Barack Obama gave the go-ahead for U.S. forces to raid a northern Pakistan housing compound based on "what was probably a 50-50 chance that Osama bin Laden was there," his national security adviser said.

"At the end of last year, we assessed that al Qaeda had been diminished ... to its weakest since 2001," said the security adviser...

On April 28, Obama attended the last of several National Security Council meetings focused on finding and going after the al Qaeda leader. During that meeting, some advocated for the commando raid while others advised against it, Donilon said, given there had been no clear-cut sightings of bin Laden by that point.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 72versions; binladen; binladendead; gutsy; gutsyganda; infochaos; obama; obamaganda; obltermination; shiftingstory; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Interesting. Obama is not one to take chances...
1 posted on 05/08/2011 2:14:59 PM PDT by UniqueViews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

I’d say there’s a 50% chance Osama was not there.


2 posted on 05/08/2011 2:16:47 PM PDT by Carley (We will not tire. We will not falter. We will not fail. W, 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

Good on him for giving the ops a go.


3 posted on 05/08/2011 2:18:21 PM PDT by Riodacat (And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

That was really “gusty”. (A lot of wind).


4 posted on 05/08/2011 2:19:36 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

You got that right. Did a guy who never voted in the Senate take this kind of chance? No way!


5 posted on 05/08/2011 2:22:00 PM PDT by Robert Lomax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

“”On April 28, Obama attended the last of several National Security Council meetings focused on finding and going after the al Qaeda leader.”””

The meetings must have been on the golf course since that’s where he spends all his time.


6 posted on 05/08/2011 2:22:51 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews
don't believe it. You're gonna run a raid like that...shoot people up and say...oops...sorry....

Me thinks not.

7 posted on 05/08/2011 2:23:19 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

I’ll take other side of the bet.

I’d say there’s a 50% chance Obama was not there.


8 posted on 05/08/2011 2:24:58 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

Who? Panetta ?


9 posted on 05/08/2011 2:26:08 PM PDT by culpeper (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

Obama flipped a coin, in essence.


10 posted on 05/08/2011 2:27:03 PM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

If it was 50 50, than it was alaways 50 50, so again, why do this raid now? Something does not add up.


11 posted on 05/08/2011 2:27:16 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (F U B O ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

Interesting. I don’t see a National Security Council meeting on his schedule for that day:

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2011/04/president_obama_official_sched_597.html


12 posted on 05/08/2011 2:30:42 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Right. He’d be guilty of the same sort of “war crimes” he wants to nail Bush-Cheney over. in fact even with Bin Laden being there, he is.

Such prosecutions are bogus to begin with.


13 posted on 05/08/2011 2:35:22 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ("If Eric Holder had his way, O-B-L would still be alive today." Thank you President Bush for Gitmo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

More after the fact hyperbole BS to make the President’s call here look tougher. By the time the decision was made RUMINT has it they were looking at 90-95% confidence levels.


14 posted on 05/08/2011 2:37:03 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

Hmmmmm....probably called him off the Women’s 10th tee-box at Andrews AFB GC to make that decision.


15 posted on 05/08/2011 2:41:39 PM PDT by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews
The way media hype goes, trying to make this as "gusty" as possible, the chances were 50% he was there, and 50% he was either:

1. Went to pickup at the local take-out

2. Walking the dog

3. Out with one of his wives, to Mohammad's for dinner

16 posted on 05/08/2011 2:42:26 PM PDT by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews

If this was true, why not just approve the pair of B2s loaded with JDAMs package that was run by him earlier?

Just another attempt to try and portray Zero as a manly man as opposed to the sits down to pee metrosexual that he is.


17 posted on 05/08/2011 2:42:37 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UniqueViews
Leon Panetta said on TV and I heard him say it... that there was only a 70 to 80- percent certainty... and now its only 50%... well looks like someone is trying to bolster their failing argument that barry was “gutsy”. barry is certainly something that ends in “SY”... but gutsy it ain't!

LLS

18 posted on 05/08/2011 2:49:30 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

“Something does not add up.”

With Uberdork in office, not much adds up!


19 posted on 05/08/2011 2:50:15 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Obama Hesitated – Panetta Issued Order to Kill Osama Bin Laden

Note:This update comes some 24 hours after our longtime Washington D.C. Insider first outlined shocking details of an Obama administration having been “overruled” by senior military and intelligence officials leading up to the successful attack against terrorist Osama Bin Laden. What follows is further clarification of Insider’s insights surrounding that event.

Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

http://patdollard.com/2011/05/obama-hesitated-%e2%80%93-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/


20 posted on 05/08/2011 2:54:47 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson