Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel sticks to F-35 despite possible lag to 2018
Reuters Alertnet ^ | 09 May 2011 | Dan Williams

Posted on 05/09/2011 8:49:05 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Israel sticks to F-35 despite possible lag to 2018

Israel sticks to F-35 despite possible lag to 2018 09 May 2011 11:30

Source: reuters // Reuters

JERUSALEM, May 9 (Reuters) - Israel may get its first F-35 warplanes, seen as a bulwark against arch-enemy Iran, from the United States only in 2018 due to production delays, an Israeli newspaper said on Monday.

But the Haaretz daily said Israel is unlikely to buy jets from a rival American manufacturer as a stop-gap.

Israel bought around 20 of the radar-evading Lockheed Martin Corp F-35s, along with ancillary equipment, for $2.75 billion last year, saying delivery would start in 2016 or 2017. Scheduling and budget glitches may have postponed that by a year, Haaretz said. It quoted Ehud Shani, director-general of Israel's Defence Ministry, as playing down the hold-up.

"I am not nervous about it," Shani said, adding that he saw a boon for Israel's bid to incorporate products from its own electronic warfare, communications and other high-tech systems in the F-35, which is also known as the Joint Strike Fighter.

"This may actually serve our interests. I favour an aircraft with as many Israeli-made systems as possible," he said.

U.S. officials had generally opposed the proposed changes as overly costly and potentially counter-productive.

"In the original timetable, it was argued that there was no time" to incorporate such systems into the Israeli F-35s, Shani said. "We will hear their conclusions and I expect a dialogue with the Americans over the new timetable and the changes."

Israel's current warplanes are mainly Lockheed F-16s and F-15s produced by Boeing , another U.S. manufacturer.

Boeing had lobbied Israel to buy more F-15s but Shani dismissed as "not relevant" the pos

(Excerpt) Read more at trust.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; israel; jointstrikefighter; jsf; lockheed

1 posted on 05/09/2011 8:49:11 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Meanwhile...

First F-35A formally delivered

The U.S. Air Force officially accepted the first F-35 Joint Strike Fighter from Lockheed Martin at its Fort Worth, Texas facility on May 5. The milestone, which occurred with the formal acceptance of F-35A AF-7, comes just under 10 years since the F-35 System Development and Demonstration contract was awarded to Lockheed, and around 14.5 years since the signing of the original JSF development contract.


2 posted on 05/09/2011 8:57:42 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
For U.S. F-35 will be financial mistake.

For Israel, purchase of F-35s could turn into deadly mistake.

10 years from now, adversaries will be flying airframes with electronics similar to F-35. And be able to outmaneuver, outrun and outgun F-35.

3 posted on 05/09/2011 8:58:31 PM PDT by DTA (U.S. CENTCOM vs. U.S. AFRICOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA

You’re saying future models of MIG will be superior than F-35 10 years from now?


4 posted on 05/09/2011 9:01:51 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks for another good post, sukhoi. Which is superior, the F-35 or F-22? I know they have different applications.


5 posted on 05/09/2011 9:18:43 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Not Migs. Sukhois. T-50 for example.

Can you imagine the nightmare of BRIC churning out Sukhoi T-50s in significant numbers and equipping them with copycat U.S. avionics.

Chicom Retrieve & Duplicate got F-117a and stealth Hawk, they'll get F-22 anf F-35 sooner or later.

Idea of flying trucks loaded with superior electronics looks good on paper but fails in simulator, let alone in real clash.

6 posted on 05/09/2011 9:26:19 PM PDT by DTA (U.S. CENTCOM vs. U.S. AFRICOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTA

In 10 years who will have air superiority? USA, China, Russia, India?


7 posted on 05/09/2011 9:32:38 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unkus

The US obviously but with the risk of an erosion in advantage. Particularly with China making both qualitative and quantative improvements.


8 posted on 05/09/2011 9:39:17 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Everything I have seen puts the f-22 ahead of the f-35. But I am not sure it’s a fair comparison given they were developed for different roles.


9 posted on 05/09/2011 9:39:17 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unkus

The F-22 is for air dominance. Without it the F-35 would not have an easy time.


10 posted on 05/09/2011 9:40:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unkus
Tricky question. Will China and India be together?

I've seen a chilling analysis by RAND corporation about Chinese/U.S. flashpoint in 2020 in Pacific theater.

The biggest problem for the U.S. will not be air superiority but the number of available air bases and their proximity to mainland China.

Fight over Taiwan sky could be won by Chicoms in 20 minutes.

And that's exactly where F-35 makes bad situation worse. In stealth mode, F-35 carries only half of missiles opponents will have. If not stealth, it's flying truck. That means, double number of F-35s will be needed. And double number of support (air tankers, bases, pilots etc.)

11 posted on 05/09/2011 9:48:12 PM PDT by DTA (U.S. CENTCOM vs. U.S. AFRICOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks for your concise answers. We’d better build a lot more F-22’s than planned. F-22’s are going to be carrier based also, aren’t they?


12 posted on 05/09/2011 9:48:15 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DTA

Scary, indeed. By 2020, who knows what our Pacific Fleet will be capable of.


13 posted on 05/09/2011 9:51:10 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Israel has had considerable success with their air force. I think it speaks volumes that they want to hang around for the F-35.


14 posted on 05/09/2011 11:07:51 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Nope, the F-22 won’t be carrier based. Lockheed Martin has preserved tooling used for making F-22s, so it’s technically possible that production can be relaunched.


15 posted on 05/10/2011 12:59:31 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I can’t believe it takes 15 years to get a fighter off the ground.


16 posted on 05/10/2011 4:20:26 AM PDT by hattend (Obama is better than OJ... He found a killer while on the golf course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Israel has had considerable success with their air force. I think it speaks volumes that they want to hang around for the F-35.

Actually they wanted the F-22 some years back, but that was not available due to export restrictions. Furthermore, Israel has had considerable success with the airforce even when flying planes that were on paper 'inferior' to what their adversaries were flying. Their skill and capabilities made up for the difference.

17 posted on 05/10/2011 2:52:24 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson