Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steve Forbes: "The US Will Likely Have A Gold Standard Within The Next Five Years"
Zero Hedge ^ | 05/11/2011 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 05/11/2011 8:42:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

And another advocate for the only logical outcome out of the disastrous monetary and fiscal catastrophe the US finds itself in emerges in the face of billionaire, and open administration critic, Steve Forbes. From Human Events: "A return to the gold standard by the United States within the next five years now seems likely, because that move would help the nation solve a variety of economic, fiscal, and monetary ills. “What seems astonishing today could become conventional wisdom in a short period of time,” Forbes said. Such a move would help to stabilize the value of the dollar, restore confidence among foreign investors in U.S. government bonds, and discourage reckless federal spending, the media mogul and former presidential candidate said.  The United States used gold as the basis for valuing the U.S. dollar successfully for roughly 180 years before President Richard Nixon embarked upon an experiment to end the practice in the 1970s that has contributed to a number of woes that the country is suffering from now, Forbes added." Of course, for this to happen the US would first need to allow a full public audit of its gold 8,000+ ton reserves held at Fort Knox and elsewhere. And that may be problematic.

More from the article:

If the gold standard had been in place in recent years, the value of the U.S. dollar would not have weakened as it has and excessive federal spending would have been curbed, Forbes told HUMAN EVENTS.  The constantly changing value of the U.S. dollar leads to marketplace uncertainty and consequently spurs speculation in commodity investing as a hedge against inflation.

The only probable 2012 U.S. presidential candidate who has championed a return to the gold standard so far is Rep. Ron Paul (R.-Tex.).  But the idea “makes too much sense” not to gain popularity as the U.S. economy struggles to create jobs, recover from a housing bubble induced by the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policies, stop rising gasoline prices, and restore fiscal responsibility to U.S. government’s budget, Forbes insisted.

With a stable currency, it is “much harder” for governments to borrow excessively, Forbes said.  Without lax Federal Reserve System monetary policies that led to the printing of too much money, the housing bubble would not have been nearly as severe, he added.

“When it comes to exchange rates and monetary policy, people often don’t grasp” what is at stake for the economy, Forbes said.  By restoring the gold standard, the United States would shift away from “less responsible policies” and toward a stronger dollar and a stronger America, he said.  “If the dollar was as good as gold, other countries would want to buy it.”

An encouraging sign for Forbes is that key lawmakers besides Rep. Paul are recognizing that the Fed is straying well beyond its intended role of promoting stable prices and full employment with its monetary policies.

And speaking of Ron Paul, today the Subcommittee chairman will hold a 10 am EDT hearing on "Monetary Policy and the Debt Ceiling", which we hope to broadcast live, as it should further reinforce the logic of all those who are calling for the overthrow of the central bank cartel.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: gold; goldstandard; paul; ronpaul; steveforbes; zerohedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2011 8:42:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'd like to have some of what he's smoking.

No way the government will establish an accountability mechanism.

2 posted on 05/11/2011 8:44:16 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah right, we’ll have a barter system before that happens.


3 posted on 05/11/2011 8:44:23 AM PDT by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He also predicted he’d be president.

(We’d have been MUCH better off if he had been of course).


4 posted on 05/11/2011 8:44:30 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hyper-inflation will occur before we have a Gold Standard in place.

Why else would we need it unless we are decimated by run-away inflation?


5 posted on 05/11/2011 8:46:16 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I'm a Birther - And a Deather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The USA would only switch to gold standard if we experience some kind of collapse in the present system - such as US Gov’t bankruptcy/default, hyperinflation or war.

A gold-standard (with NO Federal Reserve!) would certainly help reign-in an out-of-control Gov’t and the present Federal Reserve that must protect Wall Street above all - but the inertia of the present system is too great, the vested interests too many. It won’t change so radically or quickly without some cataclysmic event to bring about a change in Americans’ thinking.


6 posted on 05/11/2011 8:48:33 AM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The US Will Likely Have A Gold Standard Within The Next Five Years”

I don’t think we have five years...


7 posted on 05/11/2011 8:56:33 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I agree that we need a backed currency, but there just isn't enough gold to back a currency as large as that needed for the US economy. On the other hand you could back the currency with tangible assets other than gold. Still a backed currency, but not limited to the availability of a single asset.

For example there are millions of acres of timber on land controlled by the US government. The amount can be calculated and audited based on satellite photos, so in a sense it is better than gold that may or may not be in a vault at Fort Knox. And timber is always useful, either as building material, paper or fuel. So the government could only issue as much currency as they are willing to open up resources to back it. And if a timber company shows up and demands the government convert their cash to timber, they cut it, no EPA no arguments.

The same would go for oil, coal, gas, metals and other resources trapped on government land. If the government wants to kowtow to the Greens and lock up the resources, then they can't issue any currency. It is a way to pry the resources the government has confiscated out of the hands of the Greens and the Socialists. We will have either a small government, or at least the resources and accompanying economic growth to pay for a larger government. And the dollar would always be worth something. A gallon of gas, a half ton of coal or a few board feet of lumber. But in any case a heck of a lot more than Obama's promise, that is after all worth precisely nothing.
8 posted on 05/11/2011 8:58:27 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

You are right about the timber, but if we go down that road, our government will soon claim that dirt has value. And a high enough value to fully back even more spending.


9 posted on 05/11/2011 9:07:27 AM PDT by AdSimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdSimp
... if we go down that road, our government will soon claim that dirt has value.

Actually dirt does have value. Topsoil usually sells for around $12-$18 a cubic yard. And that is the point, the government doesn't get to set the value. If they want to issue a trillion dollars worth of currency, they have to show a trillion dollars worth of assets at current market price first. The market sets the value of the asset, not the Fed. And that is what keeps Fedzilla under control.
10 posted on 05/11/2011 9:35:23 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Forbes is still pretty young.


11 posted on 05/11/2011 9:42:15 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdSimp

Time to open more gold mines in Nevada and lift the evironmentalweeie laws in California that restrict mining. California has more gold than has ever been taken out of her. same too for Colorado and the Black Hills. This is not mentioning Alaska.


12 posted on 05/11/2011 9:43:19 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
A return to the gold standard by the United States within the next five years now seems likely, because that move would help the nation solve a variety of economic, fiscal, and monetary ills.

The establishment of gold as money is essential to the achievement of a truly capitalist society. It is necessary in order to end inflation and all of its destructive consequences.It is necessary in order to take the power to inflate out of the hands both of the government and of the banking system operating with the sanction of the government. It is necessary in order thereby to subordinate the government to the financial power of the citizens and to make people aware of the cost of government spending, and to end the arbitrary redistribution of wealth and income, the undermining of capital accumulation, the possibility of utter economic devastation either through wage and price controls or the ultimate destruction of money, and deflation, depression, and mass unemployment.It is also necessary for making possible the rapid and radical dismantling of the welfare state, by removing the threat of depression as an accompaniment of that process.

13 posted on 05/11/2011 9:50:50 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Won’t happen-—there’s not enough gold in Fort Knox to back all the paper money that has been prinetd and released into the economy.


14 posted on 05/11/2011 10:38:52 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP
... but there just isn't enough gold to back a currency as large as that needed for the US economy.

That is simply not true. It all depends on the price at which you peg gold vs. the dollar. We have 8,133.5 tons of gold, and with there being 29,166 2/3 troy ounces per ton, that means that the reserve is 237,227,086 troy ounces. The Fed measured M1 at $1.89 trillion in March. To have 100% backing for that entire amount (assuming that the government actually has the full amount claimed) would require a gold price of $7,967.05 per ounce - call it $8,000. It would be a 1-time shock to the system to have gold skyrocket that high literally overnight (esp. for those short gold with no physical to deliver), but after that we should have a great deal of stability. Yeah, anyone holding gold or gold miners, or long gold in the futures or options markets, would make a killing...but that beats everyone losing the value of their dollars slowly but surely over time, not to mention the lack of investment due to the uncertainty of a continually falling dollar.

15 posted on 05/11/2011 10:54:30 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

See #15.


16 posted on 05/11/2011 10:55:51 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

RE: Forbes is still pretty young.


Pretty Young for what ? He’ll be 64 years old this year.

If you’re talking about the presidency, I believe he’s given up on that idea after not winning the GOP nomination twice.

A Republican President should consider him as Treasury Secretary.


17 posted on 05/11/2011 11:04:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"HELL will FREEZE OVER in the next 5 years," said Steve Forbes.*

As much as I would like to see us back on the gold system, the politicans won't let us have it. We need people like Steve Forbes running the treasury when Sarah Palin becomes President.

18 posted on 05/11/2011 11:08:15 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (Palin/Bachman 2012 (what will the NAGS say??? :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
call it $8,000.

So a one ounce coin is worth $8,000. So how do I go to the bank hand in my $10 and demand payment in gold? That is one 800th of an ounce. A speck of gold dust. 1$ worth of gold at $8000 and ounce becomes just as theoretical a creation as the Fed funny money we have now. When we were on a metallic standard a Morgan silver dollar was 26.73 grams of metal. That was real money.

For a properly backed currency the minimum unit should be something you can hold in your hand, and know that you are holding it. When the pound sterling came into use it was worth, one pound of sterling silver. A pound of silver is something I can wrap my mind around. So is a board foot of lumber or a cubic foot of coal. But 1/8000th of an ounce is a bit small.
19 posted on 05/11/2011 11:12:51 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

we must have information that the surface of Venus is covered in gold, because that’s the only way we’re gonna come up with enough to cover the national debt.


20 posted on 05/11/2011 11:43:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson