Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Well, his name was George Bush. Same as the former President.

And that’s as famous a name as you could get.

GWB might not have been famous, but his name most certainly was, and that was enough to make him “top” Republican of 2000.

By the time the primaries actually rolled around, all the other potential “top” Republicans had dropped out. Quayle dropped out, Lamar Alexander dropped out, Elizabeth Dole dropped out. All 3 could’ve been “top” Republican, but it was Bush. It was Bush v McCain in the Primaries, and of those 2, Bush was the “top” Republican, based on the famous name.

I don’t think Gingrich is out by a long shot. McCain was doing terrible stuff we all hated in 2007, and he still won.
He wasn’t the “front runner”, wasn’t up in the polls, but he still won.


191 posted on 05/17/2011 3:39:51 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: truthfreedom
Gingrich will never again poll above 10%. He's finished.

If you're claiming that name recognition is all that matters at this point in the primary process, you're correct. If you're claiming it's going to be determinative, you're very badly mistaken.

208 posted on 05/17/2011 4:17:35 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson