Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2011 7:26:15 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster; sushiman; Ronin; AmericanInTokyo; gaijin; struggle; DTogo; GATOR NAVY; Iris7; ...

P!


2 posted on 05/18/2011 7:27:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“TEPCO suspects workers manually suspended the condenser to stabilize the pressure.”

What the heck does that mean, in the context of N-plant operations? Isolated the condenser (valved it off)? Something else entirely?


3 posted on 05/18/2011 9:06:36 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

My guess, leaving fully competent opinion for others, is that the earthquake mechanically damaged the reactor core.

I just can’t see an alternative with the cooling condenser being shut off due to massive containment pressure changes ten minutes after the neutron absorbing shutoff rods were inserted. If the core were undamaged the shutdown process would have proceeded at that point in time as it had in previous emergency shutdown safety drills, that is, “normally”. It is as if the core fuel element tubes had changed their effective surface area and/or separation distance, or that the neutron flux absorber rods did not insert properly.

One hopes someone with more background than I will satisfy my curiosity -


4 posted on 05/21/2011 8:17:53 AM PDT by Iris7 ("Do not live lies!" ...Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson