However, it has been determined that the last number (’1’) in 151 61 10641 is in a “grayscale” format while the the rest of the number 61 1064_ is a “binary” picture. A sure sign of forgery.
Seen here:
And to be more specific here in this Scribd report.
News Release: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
And here in detail.
I specialize in digital electronics and computer programming, with 27 years experience. This document, to me, looks like a cut and paste job. I can't yet explain away the issues with it.
I'm having coffee too...
The document is looking like a forgery. If the gray scale VS binary cant be explained away, and the check box that appears to be duplicated by computer, then I have to side with forgery.
Knowing that our president made his career with the help of a career forger, Bill Ayers, this is expected.
The image was clearly processed by software that would render the parts that were purely black and white as bitonal, and process other parts as either grayscale or color. I don’t know what threshold the software uses for distinguishing between black and gray, but it’s hardly implausible that the numbers that appear as “bitonal” black were in reality dark gray, and the final “1” was slightly less dense than the preceding digits—an effect which could come about for a variety of reasons (a digit on a stamping machine which is never used twice in a row might appear differently from digits which are routinely used many times in a row).