————We work on logic and facts, you work on scare tactics.—————
No you don’t. You work solely on scare tactics.
The proof is simple. You act as if all these paid for astroturf groups are just third party rabble rousers on the side. They aren’t.
They are in the FCC. They are in the Whitehouse. They are in the Senate. They have the ear of the law and regulation makers.(I have already demonstrated this several times)
You never address that. You can’t. If you did, your whole distorted reality on net neutrality would fall apart. Instead, you scaremonger about telcos as if lawmakers influenced by marxists are less of a threat than a corporation who doesn’t yet have the power of law on their side.
—————Name one net neutrality law or regulation that regulates the business of an e-commerce company from Google down to mom-and-pop, or non-commercial sites such as FreeRepublic.—————
We know the proposals. The marxists have been honest behind closed doors, thinking we wouldn’t know where to look.
It’s a good thing the leftist media doesn’t have a monopoly anymore.
Is this the same FCC that just had a commissioner leave to take a high-paying job at Comcast? Even Rep. Issa is wondering about that one. So who's cozy with the FCC again? Do you see a revolving door between the EFF and the FCC as there is with Comcast? Or do you recognize the one between industry and the FCC?
Who's on what side? Genachowski is loaded with ties to Internet businesses. Copps has no direct ties either way, but he did work for Fritz Hollings, who was a wholly owned subsidiary of the entertainment industry. McDowell is a Republican who was a telco industry lobbyist. Clyburn has no industry ties, but is a Dem political hack in the utility regulators.
And the aforementioned Baker, the telco lobbyist who supported Comcast against net neutrality. Then Obama (yes, Obama) put her on the FCC where she pushed decisions in favor of Comcast, and now she's leaving to take a job with Comcast as the Senior VP for Government Affairs, i.e., in-house lobbyist.
But you probably see nothing wrong with that.
We know the proposals.
Blah blah blah, show me a law or regulation. Even show me a law or regulation proposed anywhere in the government.