What do you do now? The owner is the government. You pay a fee for a license to drive. You pay a fee for an agent of the government to inspect your car, and to register your car. You pay taxes on your gasoline to pay for the upkeep of the owner's roads.
You cannot travel on a road without paying a fee (or dozen) to the owner. In your case, the owner is the government.
Why is the government a better owner than a private party?
/johnny
Everything about paying the government "owner" is right; nobody gets a free ride.
I was just saying that an anarcho-capitalist believes there is no need for a government because everything can be done as well or better by the private sector.
I wouldn't personally go as quite far as an outright AC with the total elimination of government, but most things would be better provided by private hands. The reason being that it would provide a truer cost and benefit without the usual government subsidies, breaks, and regulation that distorts the market.
There is also the well known commons problem where if everyone owns something, then no one owns it or cares about it. Owners of private property will protect it in their own interest.
By the way, I've always thought the best way to save an endangered species like tigers for instance, would be to sell them to someone so that they have a financial interest in breeding them and of course selling body parts to the Chinese for whatever they do with them.