The Republican already stood up, and it's clear that she's running.
Posted on 05/26/2011 2:05:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney make me think of Dorothy Jones.
"Aunt" Dorothy, my mom's closest friend, was a warm, smart, comedienne-quick funny woman from a large family. Unlike my mom's other friends, Dorothy was single and remained so until she died. I once asked her, in the rude way only children can, why she never married.
"You know," she said while pointing, one by one, at four imaginary men lined up in front her, "if you took the best qualities from all my sisters' husbands and rolled them up into one man -- you'd still come up short."
This describes how it feels when trying to find a GOP presidential candidate. What are we small "L" libertarian, tea-party-type, low-tax, low-regulation, serious-about-entitlement-reform, non-"climate-change"-hysterical voters looking for?
For starters, how about someone who believes that the Constitution means what it says and says what it means, and won't abide the "principled" Republican politician who wanders off the page in search of "compromise" to "get things done" to "do the people's business"? Not too much to ask.
This brings us to the declared and confused GOP presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and the soon-to-be declared, and confused, GOP candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Gingrich masterfully engineered the 1994 GOP takeover of the House. He came up with the Contract With America, and once called Sen. Bob Dole, the party's 1996 presidential candidate, "the tax collector for the welfare state." He is bright and knowledgeable, which makes some of his positions all the more indefensible.
Did Gingrich really write off Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan's gutsy Medicare reform idea as "right-wing social engineering," after having praised Ryan's debt and deficit reduction ideas just two months earlier? Yes, he did.
Did Gingrich really cut a video with global-warming fanatic Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in which they pledged to work together to fight "climate change"? Yes, he did.
Did Gingrich come out in favor of ethanol and the federal boondoggle that pays farmers to convert farmland producing edible corn into land devoted to corn for ethanol -- a product that, but for mandates and subsidies, would have no market? Did Gingrich support ethanol even after Al "Mr. Environment" Gore renounced his previous support and admitted that he only supported ethanol to secure the 2000 farm vote? Yes and yes.
Did Gingrich team up with race hustler extraordinaire, the Rev. Al Sharpton, to tour the country to raise awareness of the education "race gap"? Did Gingrich team with the man who not only opposes vouchers -- a serious attempt to provide alternatives to and competition against government schools -- but who calls vouchers "racist"? Yes, he did.
Romney, for his part, ran in 2008 as a fiscal conservative elected in a liberal state and who, therefore, represents someone who "can reach across the aisle" and appeal to independents and "conservative Democrats" -- whatever that means. Unfortunately, his signature achievement is the statist RomneyCare, a Bay State "universal health care program" that includes a mandate. It served as a model for ObamaCare.
Believers in limited government, to put it mildly, intensely dislike ObamaCare and reserve a special place in hell for the mandate that forces every man, woman and child to purchase health insurance or pay a penalty. The Wall Street Journal and Investors Business Daily point out that RomneyCare fails to control premium costs, exceeded budget projections and "works" only because of money from the federal government.
Many Republicans encouraged Romney to call RomneyCare a blunder, and use it as an object lesson of yet another well-intended but wrongheaded government intrusion that produced unintended and hurtful consequences.
Did Romney not only refuse to apologize for RomneyCare, but praise it as a "state solution"? Did Romney defend the Massachusetts mandate while criticizing Obama's federal one? Did Romney thus support the concept of allowing government to force people to purchase health insurance or face a fine, so long as it does so at the state level? Does Romney therefore disagree with conservatives who call RomneyCare a disaster that other states emulate at their own peril? Yes, yes, yes and yes, he does.
So much for Gingrich and Romney. Now what?
What about Thomas Sowell? The economist/writer/philosopher/limited government/free-market advocate, the most clear-headed opinionator in America, is 80. The 80 is not the problem. It is the clear-headed part that made Sowell double over in laughter when he was asked about running for office. Former left-wing David Mamet partially credits Sowell with turning him from being "a brain-dead liberal." Yes, Sowell is that good.
Who else?
What about Margaret Thatcher, the 85-year-old fiscal conservative British ex-prime minister? Could we persuade her into renouncing her citizenship and running for president here in the States? Alas, that requires an amendment to the Constitution, which currently allows only a "natural born citizen" to become president.
What would Aunt Dorothy do?
This boils down to . . . “Who else ya got?”
Then we have but two choices: Surrender or Conquer!
And he is exactly right. No compromise
I kinda like the word conquer, but isn’t that a typical democrat term?
Forget the “Newt McRomney” boat, it’s already sunk.
Money or not, I think he's sunk.
People are just not buying it after mccain.
LLS
The Republican already stood up, and it's clear that she's running.
“This boils down to . . . “Who else ya got?” “
LOL! I’ve been asking the exact question.
I’m leaning towards Herman Cain while hoping Jim DeMint enters the race.
Sadly, it looks like it’s Romney’s “turn” though.
Palin/Bachman - 2012
I’d prefer Palin with top billing, but my top choices have any combination of Palin, Bachmann, and DeMint on the ticket.
Why stand up and get your head handed to you by the liberal lynch mob. The you get into the mosh pit the longer you can survive. The later you get into the fray the less time they have to make up lies and dig things up.
How about Palin/West 2012?
If that duo were to run and win, it would be a case of America hitting the lotto.
It's clear now that Palin will announce sometime this summer - less clear that West will succumb to the growing pull to move him near the helm.
There has to be a Republican in the mix before the question can be put forth. Neither of the aforementioned clowns is a Republican.
I personally think that John Bolton would be an exceptional pick for Secretary of State, but he’d probably scare off a lot of middle-of-the-road voters as the VP pick.
I’d love to see Allen West as VP to Sarah, but he’s already gainfully employed in Congress by the good people of Florida. We’ll see if he decides to answer a higher calling sometime later this year.
I don’t want to see DeMint become president. I think he would be more valuable as Senate Majority Leader for a few decades. I know the RINOs will fight that kicking and screaming, but if we can keep new crops of Tea Party Freshman elected to the Senate, it is not a mathematical impossibility.
I want a great president and a good conservative Senate Majority leader. I’ll take DeMint in either position.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.