When they came for the Rommeybots, I didn’t say anything, because I didn’t know what one was...
When they came for the Palinistas, I didn’t object, because I was tired of their cheerleading also...
When they came for the Paulites, I didn’t object, because that old guy just creeps me out sometimes...
But when they came for contributions, I didn’t. Because I was broke. But still I couldn’t be sure I wouldn’t be next.
Jim, with all due respect, it seems these outbursts are becoming more frequent, and more vehement. Perhaps I’ve missed the hordes of RINO spammers tormenting your servers. Perhaps I’ve missed the contamination spawned by linking to a fascinating interview with Corsi on infowars. I was under the impression that reasonable discussion was tolerated, even to the point of putting up with blatant idiots (for a while at least).
In other words, you used to blame - and zot - the messenger, not the entire subject of the message. Has the policy changed? Did I miss the memo?
I’m confused. I’ve never conflated people discussing things on FR with FR endorsing said things. Should I?
Obviously, it’s your house, and you owe me nothing - while I owe you a great deal for providing such an interesting place to come and learn.
But how are we to learn the evils of RINOs and other strange things if such discussions are not allowed?
We discuss Romney’s many failings all the time. But we do not support him on FR!
Thanks!
It just MIGHT have something to do with being a PRO-GOD site...
Ephesians 5:12
It is shameful even to talk about the things that ungodly people do in secret.