Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
If they understood that then windows would have been fine as well.
Well, I'm smart enough to know that Unix was designed more robustly than DOS and Windows - but, in my own experience, found that fear of the non-robust nature of Windows made me stupid when using Windows. I don't enjoy feeling stupid, so I bought a Unix box which wasn't designed for geeks. Which is what the OS X version of the Mac is, and what Linux would like to be. And apparently Win 7 is pretty much there too, finally. Which is good, because my daughter's husband wanted to get her a Win 7 box for her birthday and I chipped in to help buy it, confident that it was a workable computer.

25 posted on 05/28/2011 2:24:01 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I concur. Apple couldn’t write an os that was worth anything so they finally ripped one from UNIX. XP is still the number one os serving in a period that it truly isn’t meant for. That was some seriously good os for its day.

Bug win 7 is definitely the way to go for windows.


26 posted on 05/28/2011 8:47:53 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson