Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia sells 21 helicopters to U.S. forces in Afghanistan
Xinhau Net ^ | 2011-05-28 01:51:34 | Editor: Mu Xuequan

Posted on 05/27/2011 6:17:19 PM PDT by Pan_Yan

MOSCOW, May 27 (Xinhua) -- Russian arms export corporation Rosoboronexport signed a contract with the U.S. Army Forces Command on supplying 21 Mi-17V5 multipurpose helicopters to Afghanistan, a spokesman for the Russian Federal Service of Military-Technical Cooperation said on Friday.

The United States and Russia have been in talks for more than a year on the deal to provide the much-needed vehicles for the NATO mission in Afghanistan, RIA Novosti reported.

The cost of one helicopter has been agreed earlier at 17.5 million U.S. dollars. The first helicopters will be sent to Afghanistan in October 2011, said the spokesman.

Besides, Russia will also provide the spare parts, ground support equipment and maintenance service.

The Mi-17 is an export version of the Mi-8 Hip helicopter, which can transport up to 37 passengers.

In May 2010, the United States lifted sanctions against Rosoboronexport. The sanctions were imposed in 2006 after the U.S. government accused Rosoboronexport of violating the nuclear nonproliferation regime.

Despite the ban, dozens of Mi-17s have been bought by the United States for Afghanistan and Iraq over the past four years via intermediaries to avoid direct contacts with Rosoboronexport.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; iraq; nato; rosoboronexport; russia; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2011 6:17:25 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

2 posted on 05/27/2011 6:18:12 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

WTF?


3 posted on 05/27/2011 6:18:40 PM PDT by WayneH (STCM USN Retired - Winning the Future - WTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

So...we need to buy our helicopters from the Russians now? Pretty soon we’ll be buying our a/c from the Chinese.


4 posted on 05/27/2011 6:19:21 PM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneH

My sentiments exactly.


5 posted on 05/27/2011 6:20:00 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (God humbles and (if need be) destroys the false idols of the peoples. Be patient, folks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneH; All

The Russian helicopters are designed for high-altitude operations, like in Afghanistan. Our Blackhawks and Chinooks aren’t.


6 posted on 05/27/2011 6:23:01 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Before I get an ulcer, burst a blood vessel in the brain over this P_Y what is the credibility of this source?


7 posted on 05/27/2011 6:23:35 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
So...we need to buy our helicopters from the Russians now?

Budget cutbacks. MH-53s ain't cheap.

8 posted on 05/27/2011 6:24:35 PM PDT by Gena Bukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Name a US-built 37 passenger chopper that has production available and isn’t the expensive-to-fly Chinook. Psst - isn’t one.


9 posted on 05/27/2011 6:25:29 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Knowing how the russians built things in the past, I'm not real confident.
10 posted on 05/27/2011 6:28:56 PM PDT by DWC (historian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
Before I get an ulcer, burst a blood vessel in the brain over this P_Y what is the credibility of this source?

Russia, US sign deal to send choppers to Afghanistan

Russia, US sign chopper deal for Afghanistan: report

Russia, U.S. seal Afghan helicopter deal

Pick your source.

11 posted on 05/27/2011 6:30:08 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
They kick our butts when it comes to big helos.
12 posted on 05/27/2011 6:30:51 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

Yup. Russian Helos are actually pretty decent if someone’s been maintaining them. Remember, the Afghans were getting clobbered by their Mi8s and Mi24s before we sold them Stingers.


13 posted on 05/27/2011 6:32:21 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DWC

Their helis are good for what they do and are tough, well designed machines. The big failures have always been in maintenance, with predictable results.


14 posted on 05/27/2011 6:33:39 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Thanks......excuse me......

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGHHH!!!

15 posted on 05/27/2011 6:35:09 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
The Ruskies probably made us pay in cash gold.
16 posted on 05/27/2011 6:35:33 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

17 posted on 05/27/2011 6:36:30 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
If the Chinese could make one of our fighter aircraft for a million a piece but it took the U.S. 50 billion dollars a piece to make the same aircraft who do you think in the long run would win a war against each other if only the specific aircraft were involved. Economically I my self would go with the Chinese.

The big thing about the U.S. now days is it can't do anything major without a lot of red tape, money, and our split party government ok-ing it. It takes forever for plans on a computer to make it to reality.

18 posted on 05/27/2011 6:36:51 PM PDT by ReformedBeckite ( 3 of 3 I'm only allowing my self each day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Besides, Russia will also provide the spare parts, ground support equipment and maintenance service.

So our military is dependent upon Russian maintenance?


19 posted on 05/27/2011 6:41:08 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Charlie Wilson’s War......now that was a mistake.


20 posted on 05/27/2011 6:43:46 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson