If it could be shown that you did something like that, I hope you’re prepared for a sudden change of address and you like roomates who are probably bigger than you.
Because, that would likely be your fate in such an event.
I don’t personally have a problem with the castle doctrine, but there are legal limits as to how you’re allowed to apply it.
I remember being taught from a very young age that if you trespass, steal, kill, rob or do anything that breaks the law you could and most likely would be killed by those protecting same. I think that is how it should be and this criminal met his fate. Today we see things through a PC lens and that is what is wrong with this verdict.
As a woman, I’ve been told by every law enforcement and martial arts instructor I’ve known, that if a man breaks into my home and threatens me with a weapon, I should kill him.
Why?
Because if I don’t kill him, he can get up, and enraged, kill me.
That is a Hell of of a sobering thought, my friend.
I'm prepared for anything in defense of home & family
and you like roomates who are probably bigger than you
Been to jail before. Its not that bad. I domonated the guy they put in there with me LOL! (PS -- I have never been convicted of any crime BTW.)
Because, that would likely be your fate in such an event.
Dont count on it. I have a lawyer that could have gotten Saddam off the hook. I am confiddent he can make a jury of my peers here in Texas see it my way
To me its a matter of simple math. 2 Options: kill a home invader or let him live.
Option 1. Guy breaks into my home. I kill him. Chances of him coming back later to kill me or mine = 0%
Option 2. I let him live and call cops. He is arrested and convicted but maybe gets out later. Chances that he comes back and kills me or mine: >0%.
How much risk of him coming back should I take? When it comes to my loved ones 0% is the only aceptible answer.