Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/31/2011 8:03:57 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Sean Parnell, we welcome you as our newest member of the Corrupt Bastards Club.


2 posted on 05/31/2011 8:15:55 AM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

we need to roll back all restrictions and start drilling our own oil and tell the arabs to go mess with themselves. we are DONE.


4 posted on 05/31/2011 8:20:55 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Calling all Palin fans who think she is the greatest thing since sliced bread! These increased taxes had her blessing. She used the money to buy votes. It is what pols always do.


7 posted on 05/31/2011 8:27:30 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney; pgkdan
If you're saying that the current oil production tax in Alaska is the only reason for the state's decline in oil production, I don't agree.

Oil field flow rates in Alaska have been on the decline for years. Because flows are low, companies have technical challenges getting to the oil and are understandably nervous about risking leaks. They are probably years away from offshore sources of oil.

25 percent tax on net profits, or the value of the oil minus operating expenses and pipeline and tanker charges. That compares with the 22.5 percent Petroleum Profits Tax passed in 2006. The tax rate rises when oil prices are high.

Protection when oil prices are low. The big fields of Kuparuk and Prudhoe Bay would pay at least a 10 percent gross tax on the oil's value. This tax on the gross -- before operating expenses are deducted -- would be instead of a tax on net profits, not in addition to it.

Palin raised the tax on oil companies from 22.5% to 25%. But it should have stayed exactly the same as it was under Murkowski? Those companies took huge advantage of corrupt politicians. They took money out of the state and from the people.

Unlike in other states, each Alaskan actually benefitted from the oil tax increase, in the form of an annual rebate of at least $1200, and a state government that had a surplus. Alaska does not have a state income tax or a sales tax. So they should lower the oil tax and then institute an income tax or a state sales tax? The oil industry in Alaska funds everything. Oil and all natural resources in the state are owned by Alaskans.

21 posted on 05/31/2011 10:22:13 AM PDT by floozy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson