I’m not responding to all of you on this genetic predisposition thing. Just start reading on it and you will see. It is indisputable. Just get on Google for a bit and then come back and insult me with some information where MAO A gene patterns in black populations has been refuted as a genetic marker to violence. I think you will re-assess your skepticism.
I hope you didn’t take my questioning as “insulting”.
I’m not even sure, however, that your studies of MAO-A gene patterns is conclusive of a genetic predisposition to violence. Genetic isolation and cultural isolation go hand in hand, having a common cause, but not a causATIVE relationship.
IE, there is a correlation between MAO-A gene patterns and the black population, and there is a correlation between violent cultural tendencies and the black population,
but there is/may be no _causation_ between MAO-A gene patterns and violent tendencies.
Your lack of a source leads me to believe you are just a race troll.
Course I also heard a drug against that old lumpy faced dude, imagine I'd be bad natured too if I had the name Mao Ze Dung! or some such.
“Hello Mr. Dung! Is that a new perfume you're wearing or have you been in the cow barn already this morning?”
Anyway that drug was called a MAO Inhibitor, don't blame me, I'm reading right off the cereal box here.
Then again you may be on to something cause I also heard of some African natives that didn't want to drink tea with the Brits or something and was called MAU MAUS.
Probably not the same, I don't think any of them spoke Chinese. Drugs? Wellllll.....