Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG

Great post and spot on!

If you really look into the truth of the matter, the male lib suffers from misogyny. The only acceptable role for a woman is doing a lap dance on their lap. Such things as hetrosexual love, matrimony and long term relationships are for those goofy rednecks who cling to their bibles and guns.


123 posted on 06/01/2011 11:36:25 PM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46
If you really look into the truth of the matter, the male lib suffers from misogyny. The only acceptable role for a woman is doing a lap dance on their lap. Such things as hetrosexual love, matrimony and long term relationships are for those goofy rednecks who cling to their bibles and guns.

Right on!

But then how crazy is this: if "their" "sex object/personal porn star" does a lap dance on someone else's lap, oh, boy, there's hell to pay when "their" "little slut" acts like, well, a slut.

Or, for the pathetically duped and cognitively dissonate Lib women, when their husband, who, as in the case of Ahnold, was actually big-time in the Hollywood business of promoting slutty lifestyles as best they possibly could, actually lives like a --- oops! --- at LEAST an "R-rated" movie, THAT IS WHOLLY PERSONALLY UNACCEPTABLE.

It's pretty stupid, for example, to spew movie after movie glorifying adultery, sluttiness, promiscuity, shacking up and perversion -- and then go crying to the public about how you and your family were victimized by your spouse's pig-like sexual behavior.

As usual, the "rules" are for the other guy. Libs can, in their mind, promote perversion all they want because, until it smacks them in the head, they live in the la-la land that THEIR spouse won't ever treat them like crap and if he/she did, it WOULDN'T HURT. Except, um, it does hurt. Surprise.

Libs have no clue that the only reason their personal sluttiness doesn't cause them more personal pain is because, at the moment, they are still enjoying the residual benefits of general societal restraints on sexual pig-like behavior that are a result of the moral code held by the masses they disdain.

But once Libs succeed in breaking that general moral code -- so that the MAJORITY of society acts like LIBERALS --- being a slutty Lib won't be so cute anymore. It will have consequences they can't even imagine today, while they still are getting an adolescent kick out of rebelling against Judeo-Christian values. If the day comes that there are no Judeo-Christian values to rebel against, Libs are going to have a very rude awakening as to how little personal security, not to mention personal worth, one has in a society where people do not exercise self-restraint.

Libs want to -- and work very hard and persistently to -- pornify everything related to sex, and especially (as you note) related to WOMEN, and then turn around and use everything related to sex and their view of WOMEN as their vocabulary for what's dirty, cheap, awful, degrading and socially pathologicaly and nauseous.

Don't get me started. (Rhetorical comment, obviously).

131 posted on 06/02/2011 12:16:32 PM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson