To: Lazlo in PA
Unemployment is an employer expense, not an employee expense.
8 posted on
06/01/2011 9:55:30 PM PDT by
dalereed
To: dalereed
We pay into it here in PA.
10 posted on
06/01/2011 9:59:23 PM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: dalereed
Unemployment is an employer expense, not an employee expense.
But only because a particular employee was employed and the amount and length of his unemployment benefits depend in part on the length of his employment and level of remuneration as well as the manner in which he became unemployed.
14 posted on
06/01/2011 10:47:32 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: dalereed
So then what is that box “CA SDI” on my W2? Employee’s pay into it here in CA...
17 posted on
06/02/2011 12:14:49 AM PDT by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
To: dalereed
Bump. Btw - this is a reason people won’t hire anyone.
To: dalereed
Unemployment is an employer expense, not an employee expense. That's true but people think they are owed it because they "paid in". I'd like to see unemployment compensation done away with altogether. If a person wants to insure themselves against unemployment, let them purchase their own insurance. The same goes for workman's compensation.
26 posted on
06/02/2011 12:55:40 PM PDT by
upsdriver
(to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson