Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Logic n' Reason

If independents aren’t attracted to a fighter and a known ‘We the People” candidate - there is nothing ‘independent’ about them. Big gov’t wusses would suit them better.


19 posted on 06/02/2011 5:31:06 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name
If independents aren’t attracted to a fighter and a known ‘We the People” candidate - there is nothing ‘independent’ about them. Big gov’t wusses would suit them better.

Problem....the term "independent" means they follow no known party affiliation and are not registered to vote as either a dem/lib/prog/pop or a rino/repub/conserv/tpartyer.

Mrs. Palin will need AT LEAST 70% of those independents who do vote to vote for her. At LEAST 70%.

The independents will control the 2012 election. And staying home not voting for a conservative candidate will be as harmful as if they'd gone to the polls and voted FOR the stain.

21 posted on 06/02/2011 5:40:13 AM PDT by Logic n' Reason (The stain must be ERADICATED....NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson