[Logic n' Reason]

We HAVE to elect a reformer third party if the GOP gives us another establishment RINO.

I'd much prefer to see your comment posed as a question rather than a statement...something like this: "Are we going to be able to elect a reformer third party candidate if the GOP gives us another establishment RINO?"

Answer: in this upcoming election, any "third party" conservative, "non-establishment" (shades of the 60s!!) candidate will split the vote on the right.

It would be tatamount to voting FOR the stain.

So...attempting to put a "third party" candidate into the Oval office will most certainly assure that the stain and his entire regime will be in full and absolute power until 2016.

Question: can the US "afford" that?

Answer: While it may not be palatable, an "establishment" RINO is the only way to go, if the other direction leads us to a continuation for 4 more years of the current regime. Think for a minute where we'd be had mcloser actually won the last election!!!!! And there is no larger a RINO is the entire US than mcloser.
That said, Mrs. Palin would be the present VP.

Now tell me....would that not have been preferable to the sewer regime now ruining this country?

Let's learn a lesson here folks....virtually anything or anyone is immensely more preferable than 4 more years of the stain and his regime. Let's not repeat the mistake we made in '08.

[presently no screen name]

Let's learn a lesson here folks

There is one lesson - we fight for our conservative candidate, SARAH! 'We the People' don't accept what the establishment give us. BTW - conservatives don't live in fear or bow to 'what ifs'. Nor do I choose a candidate but what the independents might do!! They don't control my vote - I DO! Get a grip.

[varon]

: While it may not be palatable, an "establishment" RINO is the only way to go, if the other direction leads us to a continuation for 4 more years of the current regime.

Riiiiiight, let's change our underwear from front to back and pretend it's a clean pair...........

[GonzoII]

"While it may not be palatable, an "establishment" RINO is the only way to go, if the other direction leads us to a continuation for 4 more years of the current regime."

That would only show Rinos that we are willing to be chumped INHO.

We need to stand by are principles and maintain ourselves as an uncompromising force to be reckoned with.

[MikeSteelBe]

I look at things more strategically.

We (I) made a mistake electing the Globalist Establishment Man Bush in 2000 because it had to be “anyone but Gore”.

Looking at the history of US presidents, the Democrat elected after the esablishment Republican got progressively worse, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Obama.

By extrapolating that data, my question is, who gets elected after Romney, the Anti-Christ?

I’ll stand by my statement, we HAVE to elect a reformer.