Tea partiers to the rescue (Agenda 21)

WND ^ | June 4th | Henry Lamb

[Halfmanhalfamazing]

Whenever America gets into trouble, it is the ordinary people who come to the rescue. It's not the government. It's not the Hollywood stars who think their opinion is required to make the sun rise. It's not even the matriculated messiah in the White House. It is the ordinary, hardworking people who see their country in trouble and organize themselves into ferocious freedom fighters against whom the gates of hell cannot prevail.

The current version of this uniquely American response to danger has been labeled the tea party.

...............

At the local level, tea-party activists are showing up at city council and county commission meetings and asking tough questions. Jim Harbison, representing a group of freedom fighters in Las Cruces, N.M., startled his local elected officials by proving that they were, indeed, implementing Agenda 21 policies. Jim McGovern and Rita Holt have formed a coalition of Florida tea partiers called "Agenders." This group is presenting a conference on June 11 in Lakeland to teach local freedom fighters and elected officials about the dangers of Agenda 21.

[marsh2]

It is all over federal land management policies, federal and state environmental laws, transportation, city planning, etc. They are implementing the pattern of large core areas protected and set aside from humans (roadless, wilderness, “LSRs”); buffer federal areas managed for compatibility with ecosystem values (”matrix,” WUI); transition areas - private lands protected and limited as to human use by conservation easements; and areas of population density crowded together into “sustainable communities” restricted by “smart growth” principles. The core areas are further connected by set asides of “biodiversity corridors” - commonly through riparian set asides and Wild and Scenic Rivers designations, as well as transcontinental linkages.

This was the pattern followed in the Northwest Forest Plan (northern spotted owl) perpetuated by the strategic endangered species listing of large predators (wolves, grizzlies) and keystone species (salmon, fishers) which accomplished riparian set asides and protection of large roadless areas. It is all strategic - see the Wildlands Project.

Here is a comprehensive expose on re-Wilding: http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/agenda21.htm

[Monterrosa-24]

Even here in the deep South, Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and Forever Wild are everywhere. These UN programs need to be fought tooth and nail.

The Sierra Club and other “Green” groups need to be attacked at being bad for the environment because they support this mismanagement of our rural areas. In fact the Sierra Club has long supported many policies that have an overall negative effect on our wild areas.

[Monterrosa-24]

"...It is all strategic - see the Wildlands Project." And the Sierra Club support red tape even for backpackers: fire permits, camping permits, foraging prohibitions where picking a few berries does no damage, etc.

[Monterrosa-24]

True conservationist believe in proper stewardship of the land. They do not believe in Marxist land management.

[bicyclerepair]

Thanx to Gloria Stoneman Douglas, the Florida everglades is not paved over. There has to be some sort of plan.

[Monterrosa-24]

Oh there have been lots of plans and great conservation work. But with Agenda-21 the poison is in the overall plan.

[JDoutrider]

Ping!

[marsh2]

Non-management is not something that occurred pre-European settlement. In many places, every acre was managed for products to support the local indigenous population. In the West, it was most often done with the use of fire. Dr. Bob Zybach has just completed an extensive study of a watershed in Douglas Co. Oregon, showing Native American fire use at various intervals to produce bear grass, hazel nuts, sugar pine, fiddlehead, etc.

I just attended a Western summit on wildfire and fuels. The experts there came to the conclusion that “ecosystem” or watershed health had more to do with the preservation of the basic building blocks of soils/minerals/water/climate. Within the limitations of the basics, management could allocate the basic resources in such a way so as to support various desired plant and animal species or one seral stage over another. Within the limitations of basic building blocks, which species, where and at what density were a matter of human values and management. These values are arbitrary and could include public health and safety, human needs for food/ fuel/shelter, economic use for trade and biodiversity. These values affect one’s perspective as to what is stewardship. To some, stewardship is preservation, to others good husbandry.

The conclusion was that biodiversity or “natural” is an arbitrary value, not an absolute. “Ecosystems” were a human construct for understanding relationships between various species, they are not something that exists in nature.

Regardless, the scientists and policymakers there determined that human beings were very much a part of ecosystems and not something outside, foreign to or pathogenic to nature. It was discussed whether it was wise to place ecosystems that had been managed for millennium under wild non-use under some notion that this was “natural” and human management was not. Since many of our communities in western forest areas are a real risk of burning down and have been plunged into poverty from the inability to use surrounding natural resources, the bias was toward managing resources for human health, safety and benefit.

[Haddit]

Living here in Los Angeles, I’ve often wondered why everyone in our government is letting illiterate illegals come into our country, have kids and feed off of the kid’s government handouts.

Maurice Strong’s name first came on my radar when Glenn Beck put out a call to collect all the information we can before the internet is wiped. At that time, Strong was an investor in The Chicago Climate Exchange.

Reading up on Maurice Strong, my answer to the illegals is that in order to create a One World Order, he had to blur our borders, eliminate our sovereignty.

Canada Free Press
November 13, 2006
By Judi McLeod
http://www.canadafreepress.com/audio/judi-savage.htm
snip
Anti-American, Canadian environmental guru Maurice Strong was the godfather of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. Strong—who more than a decade later was to be driven off the radar screen when his alleged ties to the UN Oil-for-Food scandal became public—was the one-man force who pulled the wool over the world’s eyes with Agenda 21. At Rio, dubbed “the mother of all summits” while his occultist wife, Hanne was “tapping into Mother Earth’s energy”, hubby looked after the serious business of setting policy on sustainable development for the entire world. Hanne staged a three-week vigil with ‘Wisdomkeepers’, a group of “global transformationalists”. “Through round-the-clock sacred fire, drumbeat and meditation, the group helped hold the “energy pattern” for the duration of the summit.”

http://sovereignty.net/p/sd/strong.html
Maurice Strong: The new guy in your future!
By Henry Lamb
January, 1997
Henry Lamb does a bio on Maurice Strong here

Judi McLeod predicts our 2012 situation here:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6485
- Judi McLeod Monday, November 24, 2008

Have you ever wondered how capitalism was pushed over the edge of the cliff just six weeks before the American presidential election?

According to financial experts, the world, as we know it will change dramatically by the year 2012. People, who provided for their families only three years ago, will be desperately searching for food.

The story of the economic meltdown of 2008 begins and ends with the United Nations and its carefully managed One World Order.

Behind the curtain of this dark chapter in human misery are ogres Maurice Strong and George Soros.

[B4Ranch]

Oh, these are sorry days.

[marsh2]

This is an interesting series: George Hunt on the Gang Behind the 1992 Earth Summit (ultra wealthy; Maurice Strong)
Part 1; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93WvhaSllm0&feature=related
Part 2; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcUZk8DXrq8&NR=1 Part 3; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMnuVJbEsSE&feature=related
Part 4; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Dno99QPGq0&NR=1

I have a terrible feeling this is leading up to a derivitives type market in natural resources set aside from use under mitigations banking for industry’s impact on the environment http://users.sisqtel.net/armstrng/ecosystem_services.htm

You could see Gore try and pull it together with the Carbon trading market. I believe Theresa Heinz Kerry and George Soros are up to their eyeballs in that.

[B4Ranch]

Freepers aren’t yet ready to believe in One World Order.

[W. W. SMITH]

[Freepers aren’t yet ready to believe in One World Order.]

This one is, but only if I'm the world dictator. First order of business, remove all progressives from office and send to reeducation camp. Don't need much more since that solves most world problems.

[B4Ranch]

I meant they do not believe there is an actual plan in place that is followed by both parties to bring a NEW WORLD ORDER into place.