Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cold Fusion #1 Claims NASA Chief (Focardi & Rossi - not cold fusion but close enough)
PESN ^ | June 2, 2011 | Hank Mills

Posted on 06/05/2011 11:56:09 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

BFL

probably means “bump for later” as in read it later (from one’s ping page).

But it could mean Babes For Lingerie, which I like better than Belgians and soccer.


21 posted on 06/05/2011 2:18:02 PM PDT by bajabaja (Too ugly to be scanned at the airports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bajabaja
Babes For Lingerie

Is there a ping list for that? I'm asking for a friend....

/johnny

22 posted on 06/05/2011 2:35:40 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; bajabaja; JRandomFreeper

“Bookmark For Later”
(but if there is a ping list for babes for lingerie...please add me)


23 posted on 06/05/2011 2:42:53 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a (small) monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bajabaja

Well,,,, I thought it might mean Big Fat Liar, which is one of the selections a wiki.


24 posted on 06/05/2011 2:45:20 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hc87

I think the force involved is supposed to be the weak force, not the strong force. However, I am skeptical at this point. It’s chemistry, not physics, and that involves the atoms, not the nuclei, In any event, it certainly isn’t any kind of fusion, cold or otherwise.


25 posted on 06/05/2011 2:45:37 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hc87

He’s tweaking the electrons’ valence for the transformation rather than blasting the nucleus.


26 posted on 06/05/2011 3:02:11 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; citizen; Lancey Howard; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog

The Cold Fusion Ping List


27 posted on 06/05/2011 3:19:47 PM PDT by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

ditto that, put me on the Babes For Lingerie ping list.


28 posted on 06/05/2011 3:38:11 PM PDT by citizen (Palin lost me when she dumped the people of Alaska to seek fame & fortune in the lower 48. Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Doesn’t anyone look at the source of the articles they post anymore? PESN.com = nutters.


29 posted on 06/05/2011 3:56:09 PM PDT by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48; rfp1234
“Bushnell went on to say that LENR technology could potentially solve all of our energy and climate problems.”

“What “climate problems” is this idiot speaking of? “

Weellll, he "could" be talking about the coming next Ice Age, and event far more probable (and serious) than AGW. We'll need a whole lot of heat then.

Heck, he's a bureaucrat....even if he doesn't himself believe in AGW, he is obliged to give the mandatory "nod" to "climate problems".

30 posted on 06/05/2011 4:00:44 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Thanks for pinging me. I actually posted this same article last week, but forgot to ping you when I did so. I’ll try to ping you when I post LENR threads so you can ping your list.


31 posted on 06/05/2011 4:14:21 PM PDT by Liberty1970 (I stand with Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hc87
"Up until now the energy needed to overcome the strong force bond has only been found in two kinds of fusion- hydrogen bombs and stars. So what’s he doing that no one else has figured out?"

Could be WD-40.

32 posted on 06/05/2011 4:40:04 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
A Chief NASA scientist, Dennis Bushnell has came out in support of Andrea Rossi's E-Cat technology, but denies any type of nuclear fusion is taking place, saying it is probably beta decay per the Widom Larson Theory.

Does the Widom/Larson Theory postulate occasional production of neutrons, X-rays, and helium?

These guys are so touchy after the hot fusion folks did their "oh, crap, the government's going to end our hot fusion funding gravy train" disinformation campaign shortly after 1989.
33 posted on 06/05/2011 4:50:04 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

“I am not a nuclear scientists, but I can think.”

I’m sorry Citizen, if you don’t have a degree from an accredited institution of ‘higher learning’ you can’t think.

It’s just not permitted.


34 posted on 06/05/2011 5:25:11 PM PDT by dljordan ("Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Yeah, but Rossi doesn’t think it’s the weak force-he thinks he’s getting true fusion in the nucleus. The guy from NASA thinks it’s something going on with the weak force, but Rossi says he’s seeing gamma radiation. That plus the copper would suggest the proton from the hydrogen is ending up in the nickel nucleus.


35 posted on 06/05/2011 5:26:06 PM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
bfl -note to me - for bump for later - the sun was shining and I don't want to to miss one drop of it - it will be snowing again soon enough.

So I scan stories I want to read, note with a BFL - and save them until after dark

I hope I'm not committing some terrible sin?

36 posted on 06/05/2011 6:47:54 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (.WATCH THE OTHER HAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Moltke
"Doesn’t anyone look at the source of the articles they post anymore? PESN.com = nutters."

Perhaps. But they don't control the opinion of Dr. Bushnell, now do they.

37 posted on 06/05/2011 6:58:36 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

There have been a lot of claims over the years by true believers. Some of them by very smart people, but being smart, really believing what you say and not trying to hustle for cash is not the same thing is being right.

I had a college professor, an absolute genius, PHD in organic chemistry, absolutely convinced that fluoridation of water was going to cause the deaths of millions. He traveled around the country on his own dime for 30 years fighting to outlaw fluoride. Great guy, a wizard in the lab but his predictions did not pan out.

My point is, you can’t make any claim on validity based his personal characteristics. What I want to see is for him to give instructions on how to make his machine and see published results from other labs using reactors built on site.

Even if he is 100% legit, if he does not patent the secret sauce, he will never be able to market it. The first reactor that leave his facility will be on its way to China to be studied, analyzed, and copied. If he puts everything out there, in the patent, no one can suppress it, and he has legal protection.

I would love for this all to be true, but honestly, it doesn’t smell right. He claims patents but won’t patent what makes it work.


38 posted on 06/05/2011 7:26:24 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Yes, didn’t bother to click the article either.

Dummy science fraud in there somewhere.


39 posted on 06/05/2011 7:27:13 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
A Chief NASA scientist, Dennis Bushnell has came...

Whoa!

Stop reading right there.

40 posted on 06/05/2011 7:33:06 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson