[aruanan]

So which is it? You disagree with history? Or her delivery? It may have been garbled but she WAS right.

Only garbled to someone who immediately thought upon reading her comments, hey, she's wrong because Revere went out to warn the Americans that the British were coming, when, in reality, Revere went out to warn the colonists that the Regulars were coming and then warned the Regulars who had taken him prisoner that their butts were in a serious sling because of what the colonists had in store for them. After all, Palin did NOT say, "Revere warned the British that the British were on the way."

And isn't this just the continuation of her "Let's party like it's 1773" message? Only this time she's telling the "British" (those of our nation who are the oppressors) that they're going up against the tea party folk who whipped their butts in 1773 (and 2010) and who would do it again in 1776 and 2012?

[He Rides A White Horse]

"He who warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms.

I may getting senile, but it seems to me that the British were going to take away our arms. They were on their way to Concord to confiscate a weapons depot.

[DJ MacWoW]

I agree with all of that. And I actually saw a FReeper post yesterday that Revere said: "The British are coming". LOL

Revere also warned the Regulars "that their troops had catched aground in passing the River"

He warned them.