Skip to comments.
Excerpt from ANN COULTER’s brand-new book, DEMONIC: THE LIBERAL MOB ENDANGERING AMERICA
Human Events ^
| 06/07/2011
| ANN COULTER
Posted on 06/07/2011 3:53:29 AM PDT by Yosemitest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Syncro
From a post bt FReeper
Syncro:
Here is a link to her talking about the book on the Hannity show last nite http://www.popmodal.com/video/7817
She will be on the show tonite [Tuesday, 6/7/11] also.
And, from
www.anncoulter.com:
June 7, 2011, 10:31 AM |
BOOK TOUR: ABC'S GOOD MORNING AMERICA TUESDAY 8AM - CNN'S PIER'S MORGAN TUESDAY NIGHT
INSIDE EDITION |
June 7, 2011, 9:36 AM |
Excellent Interview! - VIDEO! Jamie Weinstein Interviews Coulter About "Demonic"!
|
June 7, 2011, 9:19 AM |
They're all good. (But some weren't jokes!) - DC: Top 15 jokes in Ann Coulters Demonic
|
June 7, 2011, 9:08 AM |
FANTASTIC LIST! - DC: Top 10 shocking things in Ann Coulters book Demonic that will drive liberals crazy
|
June 7, 2011, 1:04 AM |
NEW BOOK OUT TUESDAY- PREVIEW ON HANNITY RADIO AND TV MONDAY! -
|
June 6, 2011, 11:29 PM |
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT ... - Ann Coulter on Hannity: TV debut of Ann's new book Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America |
And, from
www.locatetv.com, it appears that Ann will be back on "
The View" tomorrow:
41
posted on
06/07/2011 7:45:00 AM PDT
by
RonDog
To: Yosemitest
42
posted on
06/07/2011 7:55:15 AM PDT
by
RonDog
To: Yosemitest
It is impossible for Coulter to state with certainty that Obama is a natural born citizen or even a citizen at all! Yet, she MOCKS those who have REASONABLE questions regarding Obama’s eligibility ( and used the KKK to make her point.)
She’ will **never** again get a dime from me. I encourage others to do the same.
Proudly “cranky”,
Wintertime
To: Yosemitest
Ann’s always defended the Constitution.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**ONLY** the parts that’s convenient for her financially and will advance her career in entertainment.
To: DJ MacWoW
I understand that she has fans but you have to understand that she also has detractors that dislike some of her stands on homosexuality and Constitutional eligibility.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well! Gee! Silly me! I have deal breaking issues like having an eligible president with access to all of our nation's most sensitive secretes and in control of the world's most destructive military force since the dawn of mankind! And...I don't think children in our government schools being taught fagotry is a good idea or that the homo bullies should get people fired from their jobs.
Personally, I will never again buy one of Coulters books and will go out of my way to see that see never gets any of my money.
To: Yosemitest
I ordered mine today and am now praying that it is not in this format!
46
posted on
06/07/2011 10:19:56 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
To: Blind Eye Jones
“I like parts of Anne”
Me too!
47
posted on
06/07/2011 10:25:44 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
To: wintertime
“And...Coulter is just as much and entertainer and as phony as those cute little red slippers.”
Yup. I appreciate her wit and sarcasm, but she’s just what you say she is, similarly to Glenn Beck.
48
posted on
06/07/2011 4:42:55 PM PDT
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: All
Did anyone see Annie on the Pier Morgan CNN show tonight. I imagine the show will get its highest ratings in awhile. Annie was great even though the host would not let Annie answer alot of the questions. He would ask a question and then 5 seconds into Annie’s answer he would start to talk over her.
To: CSM
This post's format is my doings, just trying to make it easier to absorb.
The info Ann gives is so intense, that I don't want anyone to miss anything.
50
posted on
06/08/2011 3:23:53 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Is CNN still on the air.
I heard there audience had all been instituted into the mental wards.
"... and then 5 seconds into Anns answer he would start to talk over her."
Yeah ... liberals can't focus their thoughts.
They try to protect their feeble brains by talking loud over facts they can't tolerate.
The best way to handle a liberal is to point your finger at them and laugh out loud.
51
posted on
06/08/2011 3:48:36 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: Yosemitest
Whew, that is good to hear....
Thanks for calming my worries FRiend.
52
posted on
06/08/2011 6:15:23 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
To: Yosemitest
I call people like him blah-blah-birthers.
Obama is in; it’s over. Start fighting the real battle.
53
posted on
06/30/2011 8:23:08 AM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(Ann Coulter's "Demonic" - - Identifies the Democrats in Detail)
To: Loud Mime
It's not over.
That Marxist, Illegal Immigrant that's defiling our White House should be jailed, and then deported.
It's never "over" until honest people give up.
May
our Heavenly Fatherdeliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh,
that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus ...
54
posted on
07/01/2011 1:51:29 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: DJ MacWoW; RoadTest; wintertime; Yosemitest
55
posted on
01/27/2016 6:38:00 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: philman_36
The Constitution, in
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, is the ROOT of that LAW.
AND .... IT IS A LAW
DEFINING the rules of CITIZENSHIP and NATURALIZATION.
So try again, LOSER !
"If Congress has to write a law to make you a citizen, you're not "natural born.""
That's a very bad '
STRAW MAN' MIS-DIRECTION.
It isn't even close to what that law is.
A definition of the rules, is not the same as a RESOLUTION declaring a SPECIFIC PERSON a Citizen.
For REFERENCE. see:
111th Congress (2009-2010), S.RES.225.ATS, which states: "Recognizing and celebrating the 50th anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State. ... Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961; ...
Resolved,That the Senate recognizes and celebrates the 50th anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State."
and also 111th CONGRESS, 1st Session,H . RES . 593, which states:"Recognizing and celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State. ... Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii; ...
Resolved,That the House of Representatives recognizes and celebrates the 50th Anniversary of the entry of Hawaii into the Union as the 50th State.
56
posted on
01/27/2016 7:05:44 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: philman_36
Also READ:
Arizona Court Declares Lawyers Mario Apuzzo and Leo Donofrio Totally Cracked on What Makes a Natural Born Citizen
Now IF the Court had given such a “definition,” it still would’ve merely been non-binding dicta, or side commentary —as any such determination was clearly non-essential to the matter they were deciding.
Such reasoning might have been convincing to a later Court — or it might not have been.
But the fact is, they simply didn’t create any such “definition” of “natural born citizen” —in spite of Apuzzo’s (and Leo Donofrio’s) elaborate twisting of their words to try and make it sound as if they did.
And even if they had — which they didn’t — it would’ve been OVERTURNED 23 years later, in the definitive citizenship case of US v. Wong Kim Ark.
In that case, the Supreme Court told us quite clearly, in not one, but in two different ways, that Wong Kim Ark,who was born on US soil of two NON-citizen Chinese parents, wasn’t thereby JUST “a citizen” — he was ALSO “natural born.”
If he was “natural born,” and he was “a citizen,”then it is inescapable that the Court found young Mr. Wong to be a natural born citizen.
The 6 Justices who agreed on the majority opinion (against only 2 dissenters) also discussed the implications of such status for Presidential eligibility.
So they in fact foundthat Wong Kim Ark would be legally eligible to run for President upon meeting the other qualifications — reaching the age of 35, and 14 years’ residence.
Mr. Wong, who lived most of his life as a simple Chinese cook in Chinatown, never ran for President, of course.
And in the highly racial America of his day Wong almost certainly could not have been elected if he had tried.
But according to the United States Supreme Court, legally speaking,Mr. Wong DID HAVE the legal qualification to eventually run for, and serve as, President of the United States —
if the People should have decided that he was the right person for the job.
There’s much deeper we could go into the issue, of course.
I haven’t found the time to refute Mr. Apuzzo’s bogus “two citizen parents” claims in the full, absolute detail that I would like to.
There is an awful lot of refutation here, here, and here,
It would be nice to put ALL of the pieces together in one place.
However, for those who don’t mind a bit of digging, the references given above are a good start.
But never mind — a court in the State of Arizona the day before yesterday quite clearly and authoritatively refuted Mr. Apuzzo for me.
The court smacked down Apuzzo’s and Donofrio’s claims in no uncertain terms.
Judge Richard Gordon DISMISSED the ballot-challenge case of Allen v. Arizona Democratic Party.
And he did so “WITH PREJUDICE,” which means“This case has been fully heard and judged on its merits
and we’re done with it —
don’t attempt to darken my door with this same accusation ever again.”
Note that again:Apuzzo’s claim has been officially tried in a court of law, on its merits, and found to be totally cracked.
And the ruling struggled to stretch barely past two pages into three.
That is NOT a lot of discussion,which indicates that this was not anything even REMOTELY resembling a “close call.”
The pertinent language in Judge Gordon’s ruling is as follows:
“Plaintiff claims thatPresident Obama cannot stand for reelection [in the State of Arizona] because he is not a ‘natural born citizen’ as required by the United States Constitution… Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution,Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986 (1931),
and this precedent fully supportsthat President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution
and thus qualified to hold the office of President.See United States v. Wong Kim Ark
, 169 U.S. 649, 702-03 (1898) (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV); Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana,916 N.E.2d 678, 684-88 (Ind. App. 2010) (addressing the precise issue).
Contrary to Plaintiff's assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.“
Ouch. That’s gonna leave a mark.
So your statement that
"natural born means both parents " has been DENIED by the courts !
57
posted on
01/27/2016 7:07:54 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
So your statement that "natural born means both parents " has been DENIED by the courts !Please cite the exact reply on this thread where you contend I made the statement that "natural born means both parents ".
58
posted on
01/27/2016 7:49:04 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: Yosemitest
You really should read “Rule #1” on digging holes.
59
posted on
01/27/2016 7:53:52 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: Yosemitest
That's a very bad 'STRAW MAN' MIS-DIRECTION.Tell Ann Coulter that since she is the one who wrote it.
60
posted on
01/27/2016 7:55:54 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson