Oh gosh, I just read your post and the one you were responding to.
This is horrible. One of the problems with sex offender supervision is that it is essentially worthless.
We have sex offenders in my town who can literally register their “address” with the sheriff as the “woods off (state road) 207.”
One of these sex offenders living in the woods near a college town about an hour from here and emerged to kill and behead 8 college students in their student housing apartments.
It is not at all unbelievable that this guy could have been capturing victims and either killing them where he caught them and bringing them to Texas or killing them in Texas.
We don’t need to have “supervision” for sex offenders. We need to have lower-level ones locked up until the lose they urge (at about the age of 90), and the more aggressive ones...who have killed or kidnapped...need to be dead. Formally and legally executed by their states of residence.
That paragraph just popped out at me....and gave me chills.
I could SEE this happening when a sex offender is involved. They DO need lock-up. They never change and they will always try, try again till caught.
They are very cunning as noted by your post as to how they skirt around the address issue!