Posted on 06/07/2011 10:58:56 PM PDT by grundle
... the type on the birth document show evidence of "kerning," the squeezing of letters into a line so that they intrude into adjacent letter spaces. Kerning is routine, since the advent of word processors and computers, but impossible with a typewriter.
Denninger explains that in the image above, of the name of the hospital, the "a" and the "p" share vertical space on the line.
"This process, of course, requires that you know what the next letter is. With a computer this is pretty easy, since the computer can retroactively go back and adjust, and it also can typeset the current letter with the knowledge of what the previous one was," he reported. "A typewriter, on the other hand, is a mechanical device. It does not know what the next letter is that you will type, nor does it know what the last letter was that you typed. It thus has a typeface that always leaves physical space between the boundary of each character."
"To refute this point you must come up with a typewriter that contains a flux capacitor and thus is capable of accurately predicting the future," he said. "This document has been assembled by somebody on a computer."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Interesting. Corsi is still making claims that what was presented is not genuine and that the physical document, not the digital image, must be examined.
This is the song that never ends,
It just goes on and on, my friends.
Some people started singing it not knowing what it was,
And now they can’t stop singing it forever just because...
This is the song that never ends,
It just goes on and on, my friends.
Some people started singing it not knowing what it was,
And now they can’t stop singing it forever just because...
Except that it might be possible for a photocopy of a photocopy to smudge in the process making letters thicker.
That's a sad fake.
/johnny
The ‘ultimate evidence’ is the presence of different versions of the same letter, like capital “A” within text supposedly written all on the same typewriter back in 1961. But it really doesn’t matter how much evidence is amassed since the current criminal in the WHite Hut is an affirmative action hire who would bring the democrat party down with him if he were indicted ... the republicant’s will help to protect the bastard because he would upset royally the only thing republicant’s know, which is maintining the status quo. We no longer live in a We The People Republic. We live in a federal oligarchy run by republidems and held up by corrupt courts who will too easily use any excuse to avoid upholding their oath to our now defrauded Constitution.
Hearings on this to begin in 3... 2... *snooze*
Not saying I don’t believe he isn’t a legal citizen, just that nothing is going to happen. If anybody cared, he would’ve been gone by now.
/johnny
This picture depicts overlap between letters which is an indication of kerning. The other test is to show that the individual letters are not monospaced; i.e., that the number of characters per inch varies with the type of letter. A couple of full lines at the same magnification would be helpful.
What if there is no physical document?
First they said the HI Dept. of Health gave 2 copies (physical printed copies) to the WhiteHut Attorney who flew to HI to pick them up. Now they say that HI e-mailed them the document. They changed the document on the WhiteHut website shortly after it was released. Have since removed most of the explanatory documents about the COLB from the website.
Kerning, 9 imbedded images, different typewriter type on same line, multiple layers, phoney character alignment with book binding curve from scan. The document is another forgery.
The frightening part is that all 3 branches of government have known from the beginning that Obozo is ineligible. Dems and RINO Pubbies are traitors.
It is likely that there is not a physical document. It is also likely that there is a "late filing" for a COLB that was "on record" but never acted upon because of lack of documentation.
Grandma did it.
do you have a source for hawaii emailing them the BC? thanks
Problem is, Obama's followers wouldn't care if it contained an animated gif with spinny logos. They would still ape the same line that if you question it, you must be a dumb redneck racist closet KKK member. They don't care that Obama is not a legitimate President because they don't care about the Constitution, or America for that matter.
And ALL of this after Abercrombie said the COLB DIDN’T exist.
Someone actually argued that kerning can occur on typewriters if the striker is slightly bent from excessive usage and the typists types extremely fast. Apparently the Klondyke twin BC has kerning also. This is the claim to refute kerning. Anyone want to comment??
HI may well have printed a document onto security paper. But that wasn't the document that was on the White Hut web site. That was a PDF image of a scan. And why would you do that? If you scan a full-bleed security paper and make it into a PDF, you would then have security pattern all the way to the edge of the image. But if you printed out the scan, you would have the 1/4 inch white border since desktop printers cannot print a full bleed edge to edge. So why would you scan it, print it out, rescan it and post it as a PDF? It's a forgery. It's been tampered with.
The bent keys would have same spacing that looks like kerning for each same letter of the bent key or keys. Kerning would involve all letters IMO. Would have to inspect more letters IMO. Im not buying kerning, yet.
What is more blatant in this document is that Stanley Ann's signature was created on top of the scan containing the doctor's signature. Her sig (half of it, anyway) was either drawn in using a Wacom pen tablet, or it was taken from a grayscale scan of a different document and set into this one. There are no artifacts around the second half of her signature. It is as clean as if someone took a digital pen and traced it. Or they clipped it from another grayscale document, but not a color one...there would be artifacts around it if it had been color. How they did it could be debated, but it is blatant evidence of tampering.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.