Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Educates The View's Joy Behar on Reagan Tax Cuts
Newsbusters ^ | 6/8/11 | Eric Ames

Posted on 06/08/2011 4:01:53 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: markomalley

Overlooking the fact that Clinton’s “surplus” was only because he gutted the military. Give me a break!


41 posted on 06/08/2011 6:17:20 PM PDT by Rockiette (Democrats are not intelligent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan
Then Donald Trump should not have to pay for it Joy and Ann.

Indeed - if Donald Trump paid in, then the government owes him the benefit that HE PAID FOR. The problem isn't that Donald Trump might collect social security - the problem is that for every Donald Trump, there are many, many freeloaders getting way more than they paid into the system. This is especially true of Social Security disability payments - I'd bet that 90% of the claims are fraudulent.

42 posted on 06/08/2011 6:22:19 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Your are right but I was just speaking to what the loud mouths Behar and Goldberg had said using Trump as an example of Evil Rich person getting SS benefits and Coulter basically agreeing with them.
43 posted on 06/08/2011 6:30:02 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

When Reagan took office in January 1981, the IRS was raking in $500 billion per year.

When Reagan left office eight years later, the IRS was raking in $950 billion per year. The economy grew substantially.


44 posted on 06/08/2011 6:40:26 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Palin / West in 2012 or West / Palin. Either combination will serve America well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
[That doesn't matter.]

It matters in that they don't have the political knowledge to argue with Coulter so her admission consoled them when they ran out of ammunition, lol.

And - of course there are a lot of RINO’s who need to be removed but it's not going to happen in one fell swoop.

45 posted on 06/08/2011 6:43:17 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Your are right but I was just speaking to what the loud mouths Behar and Goldberg had said using Trump as an example of Evil Rich person getting SS benefits and Coulter basically agreeing with them.
46 posted on 06/08/2011 6:46:36 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
When Reagan cut taxes, each year, as the taxes went down, revenue to the treasury went up" Coulter responded

Reagan cut tax RATES, not taxes. Until people learn to use the word "rates" most people will never understand how a decrease in taxes leads to an increase in taxes. At least Ann used the word "revenue." I know it's a math term, which most people hate, but we conservatives who want to educate an ill-informed populace shoule try to teach them.

47 posted on 06/08/2011 7:01:19 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator John Blutarski

That is correct- that’s why I would never vote for Gingrich - he had his chance and blew it, too. WHY??????


48 posted on 06/08/2011 7:04:36 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad

Two Kids’ Dad wrote: “You have that backwards. It was under the Newt-led house that the budget became temporarily controllable and had a surplus (under some, but not all, definitions).”

..... Perhaps my prose was not as clear as I intended, but that is exactly what I thought I was saying.


49 posted on 06/08/2011 7:38:06 PM PDT by Senator John Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Senator John Blutarski

Everytime I hear them talk about Clinton’s surplus I never ever hear a Republican tell them it was because of a Republican Congress and it’s aways tee’s me off. Repubs are really, really bad at PR.


50 posted on 06/08/2011 7:39:12 PM PDT by bronxville (Sarah will be the first American female president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
She didn't do a lot of things correctly ...
It's not just her. Why isn't the GOP shouting from the rooftops that the (previously mentioned) "big three" failures, 0bamacare and the latest economic "recovery" ate all Dem programs?
It's unbelievable.
51 posted on 06/09/2011 5:13:29 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

It truly is sickening.

LLS


52 posted on 06/09/2011 10:32:25 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES... a Conservative subsidiary of Reagan's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson