Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weiner’s ex Kirsten Powers: He lied to me
daily caller ^ | 6-9-11 | Laura Donovan and C.J. Ciaramella

Posted on 06/09/2011 6:33:56 AM PDT by doug from upland

Daily Beast columnist Kirsten Powers took it hard when former flame Anthony Weiner deceived her about his recent Twitter picture scandal. The Fox News contributor, who initially defended Weiner, has called on the scandal-ridden New York Congressman to resign.

In a Wednesday column, Powers, who dated Weiner for three months in 2002, said he “must resign from Congress immediately.”

Powers attests that the Congressman, who admitted Monday to tweeting a photo of his erect penis, was dishonest with her when she confronted him about the story.

(Weiner’s website vilifies online sex predators)

According to Powers’s latest article, Weiner wrote in an email to her before his public confession, “I didn’t send it, statements on sat, sun, monday, the girl said she doesn’t know me, I don’t know her. The people I follow are all people who ask. We’ve hired a law firm but not to protect me, to put together the team to figure out how we prevent and maybe civil or criminal next steps. We don’t know where this photo came from. We have theories. Until we know for sure we open up legal hornets nest if we say.”

In her piece, Powers wrote that she felt lied to.

“I believed him when he told me last week that he had done nothing wrong,” Powers wrote. “He knew I was going on the show Hannity, where I would use this false information to defend him in front of millions of people. I did, and I regret it.”

Powers asserts that Weiner is not a trustworthy individual, adding that she questions the truth to his Monday presser.

“There is no way anyone can ever believe anything Weiner says again after that,” Powers wrote. “In fact, I highly doubt that what he said in his press conference is even true. Narcissism doesn’t begin to describe this kind of behavior. It seems there was nobody he didn’t lie to.”

Powers says Weiner’s bad behavior goes beyond the unfair manner in which he has treated his wife. Weiner, Powers claims, is somewhat of a threat to females.

“But even if I could see past the lying and extreme narcissism that is noteworthy even by Washington standards, there is the issue of his attitude toward women,” Powers wrote. “What has emerged is a picture of a predator trolling the Internet for women—some half his age—with which to engage in cybersex.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; democrats; powers; weiner; weinergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: Texas Eagle
What a piece of work this chick is.
She goes on national TV night after night propagating lies to the American public that she knows are lies from people she knows are liars.
And then she finds out one of them lied to her and she gets her little feelings hurt.
I, for one, fail to feel her pain.

as with most little commies, her wiring is all screwed up

61 posted on 06/09/2011 7:48:38 AM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It is obvious the widespread assumption “dumb blond” has once again been richly confirmed. Thanks Kirsten!


62 posted on 06/09/2011 7:49:55 AM PDT by Gritty (Liberals at the core have no sense of a moral 'true north'. Worse, they don't care-Kevin McCullough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Powers dated Weiner? She’s worse off than I thought. Poor girl - all that liberalness packed into a pretty package.


63 posted on 06/09/2011 7:54:23 AM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
So reality smacks a simpleton in the face.

Good!

64 posted on 06/09/2011 7:57:54 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
My theory, formulated when I first saw her on FNC years ago, was
that she was the Dems' attempt at a blonde to counter the
easy-on-the-eyes appeal of Coulter and Ingraham.
65 posted on 06/09/2011 7:59:37 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
“He knew I was going on the show Hannity, where I would use this false information to defend him in front of millions of people. I did, and I regret it.”

Kirsten, you are the one who went on national TV and repeated the spoon fed talking points. Did it ever occur to you that a journalist does some investigation of the talking points before going public.

Like so much of the media, you are a propagandist not a journalist.

66 posted on 06/09/2011 8:01:54 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
I think it's a lie. Huma is evil just like the rest of them.
67 posted on 06/09/2011 8:04:27 AM PDT by angcat (DEAR GOD PLEASE SAVE US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
What do women see in this pencil neck geek?

Must be the "power" thing they're after.

68 posted on 06/09/2011 8:15:07 AM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

SUPER DISGUSTING, NOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo


69 posted on 06/09/2011 8:18:44 AM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Kirstin is a typical democrat “True Believer”, functioning on feeling and Unicorn gas while ignoring all the hard facts she has to climb over to rationalize her blind liberalism.

Has she learned anything of lasting value from her latest experience of being used by The Weiner?

I doubt it.


70 posted on 06/09/2011 8:30:18 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. -- John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Kirsten is on FNC right now.

I saw that. I love how she grimaced when she was introduced as Weiner's former girlfriend. Then she objected to being called his former girlfriend because they only dated a couple months. Classic liberal denial of reality.

The she said she'd be "very shocked" if he resigned. Well, excuse me, Kirstin, if I don't take that to the bank, based on your past judgements.

71 posted on 06/09/2011 8:37:34 AM PDT by matt1234 (ObamaCare: Killing mommies for commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: synbad600
I'm almost certain that Huma will not divorce Weiner over this, or any other behavior (whether simply inappropriate or downright pathological and perverted).

You see, as I pointed out yesterday . . . Huma didn't marry Anthony Weiner; she married Anthony Weiner (D-NY). She'll do whatever it takes to keep him in office, even if it means tolerating the kind of sh!t that would drive any normal woman to do things that would make Lorena Bobbitt proud.

Once he's no longer in office, he's of no use to her, she'll completely fall apart, and their sham of a marriage will be over. See Maria Shriver and Elizabeth Edwards as Exhibits A and B in support of this statement.

72 posted on 06/09/2011 8:44:06 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: onyx

ditto.

kirsten deploys the obama regime’s ideology onto fox snooze.


73 posted on 06/09/2011 10:12:29 AM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Really? She did it with that? Wow...

I guess it’s true what they say, if you’re looking for an easy roll in the hay, find yourself a liberal chick. They have low standards and as long as you’ll pay to kill any accidents, rarely say no.


74 posted on 06/09/2011 10:25:48 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson