Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2011 8:57:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Didn’t Canada’s 4th sub hit an underwater mountain this week and its entire fleet is out as well?


2 posted on 06/09/2011 8:59:30 AM PDT by edcoil (Democrats doing to America what Reagan did to russia. Driving it to bankrupcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If I were an Australian, I'd have to ask if Australia needed a submarine force in the first place.

After all, in a war submarines are best employed against enemy merchant shipping.

If we are talking about the defense of Australia, it would seem to me that the money would be better spent on land-based aircraft.

3 posted on 06/09/2011 9:04:44 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Not a single submarine seaworthy (Australia)

I believe the same is true of Canada. Their only operational sub ran aground last week and had to limp home.

4 posted on 06/09/2011 9:06:53 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, the underwater terrorists will have a golden opportunity now.


5 posted on 06/09/2011 9:13:52 AM PDT by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hmmm...and a Labour government is in power in Canberra.


6 posted on 06/09/2011 9:21:04 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In related news, it is reported that the RAN is selling its subs to the Muslim Brotherhood in order to shorten the period before the Australian Caliphate can be established.


7 posted on 06/09/2011 9:24:45 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Not a single submarine seaworthy (Australia)

Maybe they should let them get married?

13 posted on 06/09/2011 10:16:38 AM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

No worries, mate! Here’s the good thing about submarines: there’s *never* a problem getting them submerged. OK, getting back up to the surface can be a problem at times.


15 posted on 06/09/2011 10:54:37 AM PDT by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Drip.

Drip.

Drip.

As the Western World slowly loses it’s ability and will to defend itself.


17 posted on 06/09/2011 5:18:24 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki; SunkenCiv; gandalftb
The official answer:

Availability of submarines

The article in The Australian, 10 June 2011, by Cameron Stewart – ‘Not a single submarine seaworthy’ – appears to misunderstand how Navy and Defence maintain and operate the submarine fleet to meet operational requirements.
As part of the regular ongoing management of the submarine fleet, all submarines are in various stages of their docking, maintenance and operational cycles.

Two submarines are currently in their operational cycle, and it is incorrect that there are no seaworthy submarines.

Navy is presently able to meet the Government’s standing requirement for submarine availability to respond to operational needs.

Maintaining the Collins Class is one of the most challenging tasks Defence has. It is one of the most complex and important capabilities operated by the Australian Defence Force.

Navy, the Defence Materiel Organisation and industry continue to work closely on a program to improve reliability across the entire submarine fleet.

Navy remains committed to maintaining a submarine capability that is operated effectively and safely to protect Australia’s national interests.

http://www.defence.gov.au/media/DepartmentalTpl.cfm?CurrentId=11966

Translation of the bureaucratese: Yes, we have a problem.

19 posted on 06/12/2011 4:19:41 PM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson