To: Clive
2 posted on
06/09/2011 12:44:43 PM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(Tories in- mission accomplished)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
3 posted on
06/09/2011 12:46:06 PM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: markomalley
So sorry Bill, Canadian courts interpret our laws according to Canadian law, not US law. Bummer, eh?
5 posted on
06/09/2011 12:47:08 PM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(Tories in- mission accomplished)
To: markomalley
IIRC, it was that founder of MS who once remarked:
“Good ideas are meant to be borrowed. Great ideas are meant to be stolen.”
6 posted on
06/09/2011 12:52:50 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: markomalley
Software patents... Absolute rubbish. Patents were always intended for protection of physical creations or the arts. I wonder how much of the economy is drained each year continuing this horrible system that stifles innovation and creation. I’d guess at least tens of billions, if not a lot more.
9 posted on
06/09/2011 12:58:07 PM PDT by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: markomalley
“Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft had argued that a lower standard of proof involving a “preponderance of the evidence” would make some “bad” patents easier to invalidate while promoting innovation and competition.”
If that Canadian company’s patent was so “bad,” why did Microsoft infringe upon it?
10 posted on
06/09/2011 1:01:46 PM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: markomalley
Fortunately, $290M is less than Microsoft spends on coffee filters each week.
16 posted on
06/09/2011 1:12:11 PM PDT by
Sloth
(If a tax cut constitutes "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should count as a "desposit.")
To: markomalley
Microsoft: the law firm that thinks it’s a software company.
18 posted on
06/09/2011 1:17:41 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson