[DannyTN]

Cain's not proposing an executive order that respects an establishment of religion.

• What Cain appears to be proposing, is an executive order that singles out one specific religion for a loyalty test. You might be able to make a case that such an order disrespects a particular religion, which I don't see as a prohibition. But he's not even proposing it as a litmus test, he's simply requiring adherents of one religion to past a loyalty test.

  Would a daycare for government employees be able to avoid hiring a Satanist? Is disrepecting a particular religion equivalent to respecting all others?

  Cannibalism, because all cultures are equal. Satanism, because all religions are too. /s

[arrogantsob]

Keyes is correct. I doubt that many would win getting into a debate with him about what the constitution says.

Cain is foolish if he thinks he could obtain “proof” that any prospective nominee for and office or public trust (and that term IS in the constitution is loyal. A Muslim would just lie if he wasn’t.

Cain has no chance anyway so this is a tempest in a teapot which he has stumbled into.

Cain is the new Keyes both of whom I like and admire but neither of whom can win even a lesser office much less the nomination.

[Scotsman will be Free]

I believe that Cain is a fool if he is willing to believe any muslim about anything except their desire to cut our throats.