How can the LA times claim the emails show she’s “polarizing” without knowing what the norm is for a governor’s email? What is their basis for this claim? Have they considered that getting angry emails and the occasional death threat probably isn’t real unusual for governor? But for Palin it’s proof that she’s polarizing. Nevermind that when these emails were written she had something like an 80% approval rating in Alaska.
See post #48.
They just want to hear her deny it.