Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: The Fed's $600 Billion Stealth Bailout Of Foreign Banks Continues At The Expense Of The
Zero Hedge ^ | 6/12/11 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 06/12/2011 12:13:59 AM PDT by Nachum

Courtesy of the recently declassified Fed discount window documents, we now know that the biggest beneficiaries of the Fed's generosity during the peak of the credit crisis were foreign banks, among which Belgium's Dexia was the most troubled, and thus most lent to, bank. Having been thus exposed, many speculated that going forward the US central bank would primarily focus its "rescue" efforts on US banks, not US-based (or local branches) of foreign (read European) banks: after all that's what the ECB is for, while the Fed's role is to stimulate US employment and to keep US inflation modest. And furthermore, should the ECB need to bail out its banks, it could simply do what the Fed does, and monetize debt, thus boosting its assets, while concurrently expanding its excess reserves thus generating fungible capital which would go to European banks. Wrong. Below we present that not only has the Fed's bailout of foreign banks not terminated with the drop in discount window borrowings or the unwind of the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, but that the only beneficiary of the reserves generated were US-based branches of foreign banks (which in turn turned around and funnelled the cash back to their domestic branches), a shocking finding which explains not only why US banks have been unwilling and, far more importantly, unable to lend out these reserves, but that anyone retaining hopes that with the end of QE2 the reserves that hypothetically had been accumulated at US banks would be flipped to purchase Treasurys, has been dead wrong, therefore making the case for QE3 a done deal. In summary, instead of doing everything in its power to stimulate reserve, and thus cash, accumulation at domestic (US) banks which would in turn encourage lending to US borrowers,

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; feds; foreign; stealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Nachum
My favorite part:

“Which brings us to point #2: prepare for the Bernanke hearings and possible impeachment. For if it becomes popular knowledge that the Chairman of the Fed, despite explicit instructions to enforce the trickle down of “printed” dollars to US banks, was only concerned about rescuing foreign banks with the $600 billion in excess cash created out of QE2, then all political hell is about to break loose, and not even Democrats will be able to defend Bernanke’s actions to a public furious with the complete inability to procure a loan. Any loan. Furthermore the data above proves beyond a reasonable doubt why there has been no excess lending by US banks to US borrowers: none of the cash ever even made it to US banks! This also resolves the mystery of the broken money multiplier and why the velocity of money has imploded.”

21 posted on 06/12/2011 11:34:13 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

HOORAY Tyler Durden! Imprison Bernanke. Eliminate the FED.


22 posted on 06/12/2011 2:15:13 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Unfortunately, our nearly illiterate electorate will never understand what was done to them.


23 posted on 06/13/2011 2:54:31 PM PDT by dadgum (Overjoyed to be a Pariah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

yes. look what happened to the Irish.

they had almost ZERO national debt.
then the politicians passed a law, that made the taxpayers on the hook for the banks.
...then, shockingly, it turned out the banks were underwater.

...now, the Irish and their children will be paying for decades.

(and, btw, i think the Founding Fathers would applaud your earlier righteous anger. just because we less violent and more restrained than our Founding Fathers, doesn’t mean we care less about our children’s freedom.)


24 posted on 06/13/2011 5:50:48 PM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson