Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paridel
From Quackwatch: Stanislaw Burzynski and "Antineoplastons"
34 posted on 06/12/2011 3:19:34 PM PDT by Zakeet (The difference between the Wee Wee and a battery ... the battery has a positive side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Zakeet
From your Quackwatch link:

Tests of antineoplastons at the National Cancer Institute have never been positive. The drug company Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals could not duplicate Burzynski's claims for AS-2.1 and A-10. The Japanese National Cancer Institute has reported that antineoplastons did not work in their studies. No Burzynski coauthors have endorsed his use of antineoplastons in cancer patients.

Watch the film and you will find out why. They all lied about what they did. It is documented in their own reports, in court documents and in FDA documents. In one FDA report they categorically say that "antineoplastons are not toxic and highly effective."

37 posted on 06/12/2011 3:35:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson