Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2011 7:30:36 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ilovesarah2012

Not a dime from me while the TSA mouthbreathers are in control....


2 posted on 06/14/2011 7:32:10 AM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

If you’re traveling light you can check your bag at the gate and avoid any baggage fees.


3 posted on 06/14/2011 7:37:12 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
What's that? Have we located an industry which may be profitable? They -- they charge fees? Is that legal?? Can we raid them? Charge them with RICO? Should the executives all go to prison over this? I mean ... profits are bad ... right?
5 posted on 06/14/2011 7:39:45 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

And if the money were buried in higher airfares instead of being explicitly based on activities?


6 posted on 06/14/2011 7:40:51 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
U.S. airlines collect $5.7 billion in fees

Good for the airlines!

If passengers don't like it...don't fly.

Oh, wait...flying is a right, right?

8 posted on 06/14/2011 7:46:41 AM PDT by moovova (That laser-like focus was just a sharp stick in the eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

There is one cost cutting idea that has been proposed many times, but the airlines just can’t make it happen. A few companies have been created for it, but just didn’t have the backing to survive.

The idea is that passenger transport and luggage cargo have very different shipping needs, and combining the two, as is done today, is both expensive and inefficient. So why not put them on two different aircraft? That way, cargo would only fly when the plane was full, and passenger transport would be a lot cheaper.

The way it would work in practice is for luggage to be initially shipped out before the passenger leaves. To start with, a van shows up at their home or destination before the trip, takes the luggage to the departure airport, where it is shipped. Then, at the destination airport, it is picked up by another van and taken to the passenger’s eventual destination.

Then the passenger flies light on a plane with just carry on luggage, using a lot less fuel than if it was also carrying cargo. Or if it carried cargo as well, it would be higher valued cargo, not low value luggage.

So the passenger airline either saves money or makes more money. Passengers don’t have to wrestle with luggage, pay less for passage, and transportation security is also much better.

They do pay a separate fee for their luggage, though. But it is a low cargo rate, not expensive luggage rate.


10 posted on 06/14/2011 7:52:14 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012

One reason I believe there is an opening for a third-party Populist rabble-rouser in next year’s election.

You can easily imagine someone running on a platform of “I’m gonna stop those Grrrrreeedy Bastards from NICKEL AND DIMING the American People!”

Airlines - nickel and diming with fees
Banks - nickel and diming with fees
Credit Card Companies - nickel and diming with fees
Cell Phone Carriers - nickel and diming with fees
Cable TV and ISP Companies - nickel and diming with fees

Of course Federal, State and Local Governments are the biggest offenders at Nickel and Diming us. But I suspect this approach will gain a great deal of traction for somebody.


11 posted on 06/14/2011 7:56:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ilovesarah2012
All of the sudden the liberal bias media is interested in slamming certain airlines, I wonder why. Did not these airlines give enough money to the blackmailing thugs at the Democrat party, or maybe they are jeaulous because maybe just maybe the airlines gave more money to the Republican party. It makes you wonder.

Or is it they don't want us flying but rather have us buy one of their new gas efficinet Government Motors car to do your traveling.

12 posted on 06/14/2011 7:57:58 AM PDT by ReformedBeckite ( 2 of 3 I'm only allowing my self each day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson