Posted on 06/14/2011 7:52:30 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
Firstly, GUILTY - by FR Standards.
Secondly, so dumb that she must be a natural blond who colored her hair.
But, the good news is that one more mouth breathing, bottom feeding, social predator won’t be attacking the basis of America much longer.
“Behavioral psychologists used to use rats in experiments, but now they mostly work with lawyers. Why? Well, it turns out that there are some things that rats just wont do ...”
Another major factor is that investigators do not become attached to lawyers.
No, but Chandoo has a friend named Harrison J. Bounel.
The crux of her crime is that she didn’t get a license to operate a sexual rehabilitation clinic.
Then she could claim she was providing professional rehabilitation services to sexual perverts and whore mongers like Bill Clinton, Elliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner.
You might say she has gone from amateur to professional.
It looks like she was servicing Johns for a measly $50 before she got her law degree.
Now, as a licensed attorney, she will be legally qualified to charge them $5,000 dollars or more. But they won't even get a kiss.
I used to live in Sycamore. It used to be right next to DeKalb. I didn't realized they moved it 65 miles over to Chicago since then.
That’s about right. I’m surprised this is news.
True, but most female Lawyers around here are required to keep their skirts below their knees. to avoid a repeat of the OK Judge.
I’ve never used the services of someone like this. Using a prostitute doesn’t appeal to me.
That being said, it strikes me as very destructive to attack women who do this.
Okay, she offered services to a guy for $50 bucks. Now, lets take her law license, lock her up on the tax-payers dollar, and effectively ruin her life.
One of her escapades took place within 1000 feet of a school. That elevates the act to a felony. Why? Did she make an indecent display in public? Were children passing near when she was doing something in a car?
Is what she did really so bad that she deserves this?
No.
We don’t have enough manpower to take illegal aliens into custody and deport them, but we do have enough manpower to lock women up who made an agreement with another human being to do something they both wanted to do.
If a guy goes out on a first date and spends $200 on their meals, then goes to his place right next door to a school and engages in sex, it’s all okay. The female is guilty of nothing.
If a woman agrees to oral sex for $50 and enters a dwelling within 1000 feet of a school and follows through, she’s guilty of a felony? Really?
Someone needs to explain to me what damage was done to the children of that school in the prostitutes act, that was worse than what took place in the date’s act.
There are some serious inequities involved here.
I don’t buy into this at all. This woman should be released, all charges dismissed.
Sentence reduced to time served. Remand her to my custody... :-)
Set-up, drugs or she had mental illness (besides being prostitute)?
Most likely mental illness. Bipolar Perhaps with impaired judgement
So, 1001 feet from a school, no problem?
Was there a sex proximity law created? Was it to protect students from their teachers and this lawyer got caught up in the net?
Practice makes perfect, they say!
Here this poor girl had a service-sector job in Illinois and then dropped down to become a lawyer. Folks, won’t you please send $50 to the ILLINOIS SAVE-A-WHORE FOUNDATION? Keep good kids out of law school and save them from a life of bickering and avarice.
I graduated from the same law school but I don’t remember it being nearly as much fun back then.
Don't feel bad, there are whole big chunks of the eighties that I can't remember.
Nope. Still GUILTY!
Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.