Are you really arguing in 2011, that AIDS is a homosexual, and druggie thing?
Here’s your chance to clarify yourself, rather than whine I’m putting words into someone’s mouth. I mean, why stop there? Why not just deny AIDS ever existed.
Are you really arguing in 2011, that AIDS is a homosexual, and druggie thing?
Here’s your chance to clarify yourself, rather than whine I’m putting words into someone’s mouth. I mean, why stop there? Why not just deny AIDS ever existed.
You seem remarkably immune to simple points.
You said:
A. There are no reliable AIDS/HIV stats.
B. AIDS and HIV are not a homosexual thing, or a drug user thing. Please don’t mislead anyone into thinking otherwise.
I pointed out that if A is true, then you positively cannot make the assertion of B on any basis of fact.
The methodology of how the CDC compiled the statistics for the 2009 is right
HERE. I know you didn't time to read this before you replied previously, so it would be informative to know how you
know, not
deeply or earnestly believe that there are "no reliable AIDS/HIV" statistics.
I've presented the most recent statistics on a disease that's been around at least since the 1970s (aside from possible outliers) compiled by one of the best centers in the world for the study of disease and its epidemiology and your response is basically, "Nuh uh! They don't know what they're talking about. No one does. And because of that I will make an assertion that is also scientifically void because of what I claim but go on to claim that it still has a higher truth quotient, based on the intensity of my feeling of what I think
ought to be."